HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MUNNURI LAXMAN
LAXMAN SINGH BHATI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW / 2467 / 2026
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JD:6696]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2467/2026
Laxman Singh Bhati S/o Shri Ugam Singh Bhati, Aged About 43
Years, R/o Plot No. 114, Hanwant A, B.J.S. Colony, Jodhpur
(Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Additional Chief
Secretary, Forests And Environment, Government Of
Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. The Divisional Chief Conservator Of Forests, Jodhpur
(Raj.).
3. The Deputy Conservator Of Forests, Jaisalmer (Raj.).
4. The Deputy Conservator Of Forests, Investigation, Office
Of The Principal Chief Conservator Of Forests (Head Of
Forest Force), Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.).
5. The Principal Chief Conservator Of Forests (Head Of
Forest Force), Rajasthan Jaipur (Raj.).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yashpal Khileree
Mr. Ravinder Singh Champawat
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahaveer Bishnoi, AAG (Caveator)
with Mr. Gaurav Bishnoi
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNNURI LAXMAN
Order
05/02/2026
1. On the request and with the consent of the learned counsel
appearing on behalf of both the parties, the matter is taken up for
final disposal at the admission stage.
2. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order
dated 28.01.2026 (Annex.1), whereby the petitioner was placed
(Uploaded on 05/02/2026 at 05:58:52 PM)
(Downloaded on 07/02/2026 at 02:24:33 AM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JD:6696] (2 of 4) [CW-2467/2026]
under Awaiting Posting Order (APO) by changing the
Headquarters.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that the orders impugned are of a stigmatic nature and an
employee cannot be placed on APO on the ground that some
complaints have been received, which order, in effect, amounts to
a stigmatic order, which could only be done by a proper inquiry.
4. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing on behalf of
the respondent-caveator submits that this order has been passed
on account of multiple complaints received against the petitioner,
and he submits that on account of the complaints only, he was
shifted from the Headquarters by placing him on APO. Such order
does not suffer from any perversity.
5. The Rules with regard to placing the employee on APO and
change of Headquarters are contained under Rule 7(8)(b) and
Rule 25-A of the Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 (hereinafter
referred to as ‘the Rules of 1951’).
6. The Rule 7(8)(b)(iii) of the Rules of 1951 reads as follows:
“Rule 7-Unless there be something repugnant in
the subject or context the terms defined in this
Chapter are used in the rules in the sense here
explained:—
(1) to (7) xxxxxxxxxxx
(8) Duty:-
(a) xxxxxxxxxxx
(b) Government may issue orders declaring that
in the following circumstance, or in
circumstances similar thereto, a Government
servant may be treated as on duty.
(i) xxxxxxxxxxxx
(Uploaded on 05/02/2026 at 05:58:52 PM)
(Downloaded on 07/02/2026 at 02:24:33 AM)
##PAGE3##[2026:RJ-JD:6696] (3 of 4) [CW-2467/2026]
(ii) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(iii) In the case of persons who, on their first
appointment to State Service, do not, before they
report themselves at the seat of Government or other
specified station, in accordance with the orders of the
appointing authority, receive orders to take charge of
a specified post, during the interval between the date
of such report and the date on which they take charge
of their duties.
Note:- Period of compulsory waiting by a Government
servant returning from leave or after making over
charge of his old post for orders of Government
posting him to a particular post falls in this clause.”
7. Rule 25-A of the Rules of 1951 reads as follows:
“25. Pay during course of training etc.—
xxxxxxxxxxxx
25A. Pay daring awaiting posting orders.— A
Government servant who is compulsorily kept under
awaiting posting orders under note below Rule7(8)(b)
(iii) shall be entitled to the pay and allowances at the
rate at which he was drawing immediately before
relinquishing charge in the old post. He shall not be
allowed Conveyance Allowance or permanent
Travelling Allowance during the period of awaiting
posting order.”
8.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.