HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
KULDEEP MATHUR
CHHOTU SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 860 / 2026
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JD:6439]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 860/2026
Chhotu Singh S/o Unkar Singh, Aged About 32 Years, Resident
Of Sankal Kheda Police Station Bijaypur District Chittorgarh (At
Present Lodged In District Jail Pali)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kailash Khilery
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Surendra Bishnoi, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
04/02/2026
1. This second application for bail under Section 483 BNSS (439
Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in
connection with F.I.R. No.242/2023, registered at Police Station
Siriyari, District Pali, for offences under Sections 8/18 & 29 of
NDPS Act.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that as per the
prosecution, 19.10.2023, during a police blockade (nakabandi), a
public transport bus bearing number RJ-22-PA-4139 of Rajasthan
Roadways was checked and 4.530 kgs. of contraband opium was
recovered from the conscious possession of the co-accused –
Ganpat Singh. Learned counsel submitted that the co-accused –
Ganpat Singh (S.B. Criminal Misc. II Bail Application
No.9913/2024) has already been enlarged on bail by the co-
ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 06.09.2024. Learned
counsel submitted that the co-accused – Ganpat Singh while in
(Uploaded on 04/02/2026 at 05:11:10 PM)
(Downloaded on 07/02/2026 at 03:26:56 AM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JD:6439] (2 of 6) [CRLMB-860/2026]
judicial custody divulged an information that the recovered
contraband was procured by him from the present petitioner.
Learned counsel submitted that apart from the disclosure
statements of the co-accused – Ganpat Singh, there is no other
direct/circumstantial evidence available on record indicating
involvement of the petitioner in commission of the alleged crime.
3. Lastly, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
petitioner is in judicial custody; the investigation against him has
already been concluded; the challan against him has already been
filed before the competent criminal Court by the Investigating
Agency; and therefore, the trial against him is not likely to be
concluded in the near future. On these grounds, learned counsel
implored this Court to enlarged the petitioner on bail.
4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently
opposed the bail application and submitted that in the present
case, the allegations against the present petitioner is of supplying
contraband opium greater than commercial quantity was
recovered from the conscious and exclusive possession of the co-
accused – Ganpat Singh. Learned counsel submitted that looking
to the seriousness of the allegations levelled against him, he does
not deserve to be enlarged on bail. However, he was not in a
position to refute the fact that the co-accused – Ganpat Singh has
already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this
Court.
5. Heard learned counsel for the parties at Bar. Perused the
material available on record.
(Uploaded on 04/02/2026 at 05:11:10 PM)
(Downloaded on 07/02/2026 at 03:26:56 AM)
##PAGE3##[2026:RJ-JD:6439] (3 of 6) [CRLMB-860/2026]
6. The order dated 06.09.2024 passed by the co-ordinate
Bench of this Court while enlarging the co-accused – Ganpat Ram
on bail is reproduced below for ready reference:
“1. Arrested in furtherance of FIR No.242/2023, registered at Police
Station Siriyari, District Pali, petitioner has filed this application
under Section 439 Cr.P.C. (Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023) for
releasing him on bail. The petitioner is charged for offences
punishable under Section 8/18 of the NDPS Act.
2. Earlier, applicant made an endeavor for seeking bail by way of
filing first bail application which was disposed of without considering
the merits of the case since it was not pressed. Now post recording
of statement of seizure officer, this second bail application has been
moved.
3. The accusation against the petitioner-accused is that on
19.10.2023, during a police blockade, a pu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.