SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 2193

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
NUPUR BHATI
ANURADHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW / 15737 / 2018



##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JD:6472]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16206/2018

Deepika D/o Shri Surjeet Singh, Aged About 24 Years, Ward No. 12,

Sangria, Tehsil Sangria, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Thorugh The Secretary, Department Of

Education (Group-Ii), Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat,

Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. The Director, Secondary Edcation, Rajasthan, Bikaner.

3. The Dy. Director, Secondary Education, Jaipur Division, Jaipur.

4. The Dy. Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner Division,

Bikaner.

----Respondents

Connected With

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15737/2018

Anuradha D/o Shri Krishan Kumar, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of

Village Kanwarpura, Post Thandewala, Tehsil Raisinghnagar, District Sri

Ganganagar, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of

Education (Group-Ii), Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat,

Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.

3. The Dy. Director, Secondary Education, Jaipur, Division, Pali.

4. The Dy. Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner Division,

Bikaner.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Inderjeet Yadav

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhupesh Charan

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI

Order

04/02/2026

(In SBCWP No.16206/2018)

(Uploaded on 04/02/2026 at 06:00:53 PM)

(Downloaded on 07/02/2026 at 04:12:21 AM)

##PAGE2##

[2026:RJ-JD:6472] (2 of 3) [CW-16206/2018]

1. Grievance of the petitioner stems out of an impugned order dated

30.09.2018 (Annex.4), vide which the petitioner was allotted Jaipur

Division. Further, issued directions to the respondents to allot Bikaner

Division and provide posting to the petitioner against the post of Senior

Teacher (English) lying vacant in various schools in Bikaner Division.

However, during the pendency of writ proceedings, a co-ordinate bench

of this Court passed an interim order dated 23.10.2018 staying the

implementation of the impugned order.

2. Aforesaid stay order continues to subsist in favor of the petitioner till

date.

3. Transfers are a standard and integral aspect of government

employment conditions. Employees do not possess an inherent right to

demand continuation of their service at a specific location. 4. This court

ordinarily refrains from intervening in transfer matters, acknowledging

administrative needs for employees to fulfill their duties at assigned

locations.

5. In the instant case, given the duration of the interim protection

granted by this court, its utility appears to have waned over time. 6. Be

that as it may, the interim order is made absolute, but with liberty to

the respondents to pass fresh orders in future, if necessary due to

administrative exigency.

7. In the parting, it is made clear that granting liberty to pass fresh

orders is not to be construed as a direction of this Court to necessarily

pass fresh orders in case there is no such requirement otherwise.

8. Disposed of as above.

(In SBCWP No.15737/2018)

1. Grievance of the petitioner stems out of an impugned order dated

01.10.2018 (Annex.5), vide which the petitioner was allotted Jaipur

(Uploaded on 04/02/2026 at 06:00:53 PM)

(Downloaded on 07/02/2026 at 04:12:21 AM)

##PAGE3##

[2026:RJ-JD:6472] (3 of 3) [CW-16206/2018]

Division. Further, issued directions to the respondents to allot Bikaner

Division and provide posting to the petitioner against the post of Senior

Teacher (Social Science) lying vacant in various schools in Bikaner

Division. However, during the pendency of writ proceedings, a co-

ordinate bench of this Court passed an interim order dated 08.10.2018

staying the implementation of the impugned order.

2. Aforesaid stay order continues to subsist in favor of the petitioner till

date.

3. Transfers are a standard and integral aspect of government

employment conditions. Employees do not possess an inherent right to

demand continuation of their service at a specific location. 4. This court

ordinarily refrains from intervening in transfer matters, acknowledging

administrative nee

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top