HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ANUROOP SINGHI
BALAJI CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
THE BRANCH MANAGER INDIAN BANK – Respondent
CW / 20639 / 2025
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JP:5270]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20639/2025
Balaji Corporation, Through Its Proprietor Lina, W/o Gopal
Krishna R/o Plot No 260 Amrit Nagar Muhana Mandi Road
Mansarover, Jaipur District Jaipur, Rajasthan-302020
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The Branch Manager Indian Bank, Muhana Mandi Plot No
-138 Kesar Nagar Village - Sukhiya Teh. Sanganer Dist.
Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302020.
2. Nodal Officer (Cyber Complaints), Indian Bank, Muhana
Mandi Plot No -138 Kesar Nagar Village - Sukhiya Teh.
Sanganer Dist Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302020.
3. Cyber Crime Cell Authorities, Police Station Khatodata
Surat City District Surat STATE- Gujrat 395002
…..Respondents
4. Director General Of Police Head Of Rajasthasn Police,
Police Headquarters, Jaipur, Rajasthan-303002
----Performa Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ketan Dhabhai
Mr. Jai Kumar Jain
For Respondent(s) : Ms. Divakriti Vashisth for
Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG
Mr. Mohit Khandelwal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI
Order
04/02/2026
1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following
prayers:-
“In view of the facts and circumstances stated
hereinabove, the Petitioner most respectfully prays that this
Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to:
(i) Issue a writ directing Respondent No.1 to
immediately unfreeze the current account of the Petitioner
bearing Account No.7439605500 at Indian Bank, Muhana
Mandi Plot No-138 Kesar Nagar Village-Sukhiya The. Sanganer
Dist Jaipur, Rajasthan-302020
(ii) Direct Respondent No.1 & 2 to place on record all
communications received from cyber-crime authorities.
(Uploaded on 05/02/2026 at 02:12:31 PM)
(Downloaded on 07/02/2026 at 07:30:00 AM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JP:5270] (2 of 4) [CW-20639/2025]
(iii) Declare the action of freezing the entire bank
account as unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)
(g), and 300A.
(iv) Pass such other and further orders as may be
deemed just and proper in the interest of justice.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
has never misused the aforesaid bank account for the purpose of
illegal transactions and has not committed any cyber crime and
has no relation whatsoever to the alleged fraudulent
transaction(s).
3. Learned counsel also submits that the petitioner is ready and
willing to co-operate with the Investigating Agencies and will
appear before the Bank Authorities and the Investigating Agencies
as and when called upon.
4. Therefore, learned counsel prays that while the disputed
amount which has been received in the petitioner's account may
be frozen, the amount other than the disputed amount may kindly
be allowed to be withdrawn and the petitioner may be allowed to
operate and carry out the banking transactions from the said bank
account.
5. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent – Bank
submits that, as per the information received, the disputed
amount credited in the petitioner’s bank account is around
Rs.10,000/- and there was a letter dated 17.11.2025 issued by
the respondent No.3, in connection with on-going investigation in
financial cyber fraud complaint.
6. Learned counsel for the respondent – Bank further submits
that the petitioner may be directed not to discontinue the bank
account until the investigation is completed or the criminal case is
decided.
(Uploaded on 05/02/2026 at 02:12:31 PM)
(Downloaded on 07/02/2026 at 07:30:00 AM)
##PAGE3##[2026:RJ-JP:5270] (3 of 4) [CW-20639/2025]
7. Learned counsel for the respondent – State submits that as
the petitioner is the beneficiary of an amount involved in a
financial cyber fraud complaint and the investigation is
undergoing, no interference is called for at this stage.
8. Learned counsel for the petitioner agrees with the
submissions made by learned counsel for the respondent – Bank.
9. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
10. In view of the submissions so made, this Court is of the
considered view that merely because a certain amount has been
transferred to the petitioner's bank account in an alleged
fraudulent transact
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.