2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 2387
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ANAND SHARMA
SERVE SHRI SHRAY GRIT UDHYOG – Appellant
Versus
SHRI T. RAVI KANT S/O UNKNOWN SECRETARY – Respondent
CCP / 645 / 2025
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JP:4535]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 645/2025
In
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4767/2008
Serve Shri Shray Grit Udhyog village Lasher, Tehsil Kama,
District Bharatpur through shri Lalit Kumar son of shri surya
Prasad aged about 50 years, resident of village lahser, Tehsil
Kama, District Bharatpur, holder of power of attorney for the
mining lease of masonry stone bearing number 16/2000 located
near village Lahser, Tehsil Kama, District Bharatpur.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Shri T. Ravi Kant S/o Unknown, Secretary, Department Of
Mines And Petroleum, Government Of Rajasthan,
Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Shri Deepak Tanwar S/o Unknown, Director Mines &
Geology, Department Of Mines And Geology, Government
Of Rajasthan, Shastri Circle, Udaipur.
3. Shri K.C. Goyal S/o Unknown, Mining Engineer,
Department Of Mines & Geology, Government Of
Rajasthan, Bharatpur.
...Contemnors/Respondents
4. State Of Rajasthan Through Its Secretary, Department Of
Mines And Petroleum, Government Of Rajasthan,
Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vimal Chand Chaudhary, Adv.
Mr. Yogesh Kumar Tailor, Adv.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yash Joshi, Adv. &
Ms. Tanvisha Pant, Adv. for
Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order
31/01/2026
(Uploaded on 03/02/2026 at 05:29:34 PM)
(Downloaded on 07/02/2026 at 12:27:20 PM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JP:4535] (2 of 4) [CCP-645/2025]
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner
alleging non-compliance of order dated 11.01.2011 passed by the
Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition
No.4767/2008, whereas following directions were given:-
“(6) With the consent of the parties, I dispose of all
the aforesaid writ petitions with the following
direction:
(a) The petitioners who have already filed
applications for allotment of alternate mines in lieu of
cancellation of the mining leases in ‘Brij Chorasi Kos
Parikrama', their applications shall be decided in
accordance with the Policy dated 03.10.2008 and
subsequent proceedings taken in pursuance thereof
and orders passed in consequence thereof, within a
period of one month from the date of receipt of copy
of this order and appropriate sanction orders be
passed for allotment of alternate mines and
thereafter, the parties shall further proceed in
accordance with the Minor Mineral Concession Rules,
1986.
(b) The petitioners who have not applied so far, may
now apply within a period of fifteen days from the
date of receipt of copy of this order, for grant of
alternate mining lease area in lieu of cancellation of
their existing mining leases and their applications
shall be decided within a period of one month
thereafter in accordance with the aforesaid
rehabilitation policy dated 03.10.2008 and
subsequent proceedings taken in pursuance thereof
and orders passed in consequence thereof and
appropriate sanction order be issued. Thereafter, the
parties shall further proceed in accordance with the
Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1986.
(c) In pursuance to the aforesaid impugned orders of
cancellation of the mining lease of the petitioners, the
respondents may take possession of the existing
mining lease area in "Brij Chorasi Kos Parikrama", if it
has not been taken so far.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
pursuant to such directions, vide letter dated 31.10.2017
guidelines were sought by the Director, Mines & Geology, for
proceeding further in the matter of as many as 16 persons
(Uploaded on 03/02/2026 at 05:29:34 PM)
(Downloaded on 07/02/2026 at 12:27:20 PM)
##PAGE3##[2026:RJ-JP:4535] (3 of 4) [CCP-645/2025]
including the petitioner, however, despite that letter of intent (LOI)
was not issued, which is reflected from letter dated 31.01.2018
issued by the Director. Learned counsel submits that the
respondents have treated the petitioner with hostile discrimination
for the reason that in other cases, where writ petitions were filed
by the petitioners along with the petitioner and disposed of vide
order dated 11.01.2011, adopting