SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 2393

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
GANESH RAM MEENA
ASHOK SON OF KHYALIRAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLAS / 83 / 2026



##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JP:4523]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 83/2026

Ashok Son Of Khyaliram, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of

Village Adhira (Chhind), Police Station Harsora, District Kotputli-

Behror. (At Present In Central Jail, Alwar)

----Appellant

Versus

1. State of Rajasthan, through The PP.

----Non-appellant

2. Jairam Son Of Battu Ram, Resident Of Adhera, Harsora,

Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan, India.

----Complainant/Non-petitioner

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, Public Prosecutor

Mr. Vivek Gaur for complainant

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Order

31/01/2026

1. This criminal appeal under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled

Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989

(hereinafter to be referred as 'the SC/ST Act’) has been filed on

behalf of the appellant being aggrieved with the order dated

06.12.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge SC/ST

(Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Alwar (hereinafter to be referred

as ‘trial Court’) in Bail Application No.462/2025 (CIS

No.402/2025), whereby the bail application filed on behalf of the

appellant in connection with FIR No.206/2025 registered at Police

Station Harsora, District Kotputli-Behror for offences under

Sections 115(2), 126(2), 352, 303(2) & 119(1) of BNS, 2023 and

Section 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act was rejected.

(Uploaded on 03/02/2026 at 03:53:33 PM)

(Downloaded on 07/02/2026 at 12:40:14 PM)

##PAGE2##

[2026:RJ-JP:4523] (2 of 3) [CRLAS-83/2026]

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the accused-

appellant is in custody since 03.11.2025 and the Police after

completion of investigation has already submitted the charge-

sheet in the matter.

3. It is also submitted by counsel for the appellant that in the

alleged incident two persons from the complainant side have

sustained injuries and there is only one grievous injury which is on

the finger of left hand. It is submitted the accused-appellant is no

more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by the complainant

submits that there are specific allegations against the present

accused-appellant of inflicting injury to the complainant party and

therefore, he does not deserve to be released on bail.

5. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the

accused-appellant as well as learned Public Prosecutor assisted by

the complainant.

6. As per contents of the FIR, the accused-appellant is said to

have made attack on the complainant with a lathi and demanded

some money for liquor.

7. On perusal of the medical report of injured persons, there is

only one grievous injury sustained by the complainant party.

8. Taking into consideration overall facts and circumstances of

the case and so also the allegations and the injuries sustained by

the complainant party, this Court without expressing any opinion

(Uploaded on 03/02/2026 at 03:53:33 PM)

(Downloaded on 07/02/2026 at 12:40:14 PM)

##PAGE3##

[2026:RJ-JP:4523] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-83/2026]

of the merits or demerits of the case, deems just and proper to

allow this appeal filed by the accused-appellant.

9. Accordingly, this criminal appeal filed under Section 14-A(2)

of SC/ST Act is allowed and order dated 06.12.2025 passed by the

learned Special Judge SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases,

Alwar is set aside. It is directed that the accused-appellant named

above shall be released on bail in connection with FIR

No.206/2025 registered at Police Station Harsora, District Kotputli-

Behror, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of

Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sound and solvent sureties of

Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his

appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing

and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

Ashish Kumar /4

(Uploaded on 03/02/2026 at 03:53:33 PM)

(Downloaded on 07/02/2026 at 12:40:14 PM)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top