HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
GANESH RAM MEENA
KAILASH CHAND SANSI S/O SHRI SHIV KARAN SANSI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 801 / 2026
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JP:4526]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 801/2026
Kailash Chand Sansi S/o Shri Shiv Karan Sansi, R/o 30, Village
Badi Ka Bas, Tonk Road, Bilwa Kalan, Sanganer, District Jaipur,
Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kishan Swami
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, Public Prosecutor
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
31/01/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483
of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of
accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.623/2024 registered
at Police Station Shivdaspura, District Jaipur City (South) for
offences under Sections 8/20 & 8/21 of the N.D.P.S. Act.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation
against the accused-petitioner is of an offence punishable under
Section 8/29 of the NDPS Act. He also submits that no contraband
has been recovered from the possession of the present accused-
petitioner.
3. It is also submitted by counsel for the petitioner that from
possession of the co-accused 984 gram ganja and 68 gram smack
were recovered which are less than the commercial quantity. It is
also submitted that the accused-petitioner is behind the bars since
(Uploaded on 03/02/2026 at 03:50:43 PM)
(Downloaded on 07/02/2026 at 12:45:05 PM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JP:4526] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-801/2026]
23.12.2025 and he is no more required for any kind of
interrogation or recovery.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail
application and submits that as per the evidence collected during
investigation, the accused-petitioner is involved in the
transportation and distribution of the contraband and therefore, he
does not deserve to be released on bail.
5. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the
accused-petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also
perused the case diary.
6. The allegation against the accused-petitioner is that he is
said to have provided the alleged contraband to the co-accused,
namely, Beena Sansi from whose possession the alleged
contraband is said to have been recovered.
7. The alleged contraband which has been recovered from
possession of the co-accused is less than stipulated commercial
quantity.
8. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Puranmal Jat Vs.
State of Rajasthan in Criminal Appeal No.3394/2023
arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.10670/2023 decided on
02.11.2023 has enlarged the accused therein on bail and
observed as under:-
“The allegations against the appellant relate to
commission of offence under the provisions of
Sections 8 and 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and
Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter
called “the Act”). Alleged recovery from him is about
35 kgs. and 150 grams Doda Posh (Poppy straw).
The commercial quantity for poppy straw is 50 kgs.
(Uploaded on 03/02/2026 at 03:50:43 PM)
(Downloaded on 07/02/2026 at 12:45:05 PM)
##PAGE3##[2026:RJ-JP:4526] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-801/2026]
The appellant is in custody for over seven months.
Charge-sheet has been submitted in the case. The
recovered contraband item having weight less than
the stipulated commercial quantity, the restriction
on grant of bail under Section 37 of the Act does not
apply in his case. We do not think his continued
detention pending trial is necessary in the given
circumstances.”
9. Having regard to the discussions made above, this Court
without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the
case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on
bail.
10. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S.
is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named
above shall be enlarged on bail provided, he furnishes a personal
bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of
Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for
his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of
hearing and as and when called
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.