SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 2400

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
RUMAL S/O MOHAMMAD @ MAUJ KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 917 / 2026



##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JP:4582]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 917/2026

Rumal S/o Mohammad @ Mauj Khan, Aged About 35 Years, R/o

Bilang, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At

Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP,

Ms. Manju Dave, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

Order

31/01/2026

1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483

BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has

been arrested in connection with FIR No. 521/2025 registered at

Police Station Kaman, District Deeg for the offences under

Sectionss 5 and 8 of Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition of

Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration or Export) Act,

1995.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the

accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He

further submits that the charge-sheet has already been submitted.

It is contended that the allegation of transporting the bovine

animal is against the other co-accused and there is no substantive

evidence available on record indicating the fact that the petitioner

was involved in illegal transporting of bovine animal. It is also

(Uploaded on 02/02/2026 at 10:38:53 AM)

(Downloaded on 07/02/2026 at 12:45:51 PM)

##PAGE2##

[2026:RJ-JP:4582] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-917/2026]

contended that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and

trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail

application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail

application and contended that the petitioner is a habitual offender

and against him, several cases were registered under the

provisions of Bovine Animal Act and other offences, therefore, the

bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed.

4. Heard and perused the material available on record.

5. Considering the fact that the charge-sheet has already been

submitted and trial of the case may take considerable time,

therefore, without commenting anything on the merits of the case,

I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on

bail.

6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is

allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Rumal S/o

Mohammad @ Mauj Khan, in connection with FIR No. 521/2025

registered at Police Station Kaman, District Deeg, shall be

enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum

of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before

the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when

called upon to do so. The learned trial Judge shall also verify the

address and the contact details of the surety through concerned

SHO before releasing the accused-petitioner on bail.

7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence

on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned

police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed

(Uploaded on 02/02/2026 at 10:38:53 AM)

(Downloaded on 07/02/2026 at 12:45:51 PM)

##PAGE3##

[2026:RJ-JP:4582] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-917/2026]

to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the

accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the

accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned Trial Court

without any delay. In case of any breach to the aforementioned

conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the

application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the

bail before the concerned Court.

8. The accused-petitioner is also directed to submit his present

address along with the mobile number to the concerned SHO

within a period of 7 days from his release and the concerned SHO

shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the

petitioner changes his address or mobile numb

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top