HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
RUMAL S/O MOHAMMAD @ MAUJ KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 917 / 2026
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JP:4582]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 917/2026
Rumal S/o Mohammad @ Mauj Khan, Aged About 35 Years, R/o
Bilang, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At
Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP,
Ms. Manju Dave, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order
31/01/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483
BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has
been arrested in connection with FIR No. 521/2025 registered at
Police Station Kaman, District Deeg for the offences under
Sectionss 5 and 8 of Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition of
Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration or Export) Act,
1995.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the
accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He
further submits that the charge-sheet has already been submitted.
It is contended that the allegation of transporting the bovine
animal is against the other co-accused and there is no substantive
evidence available on record indicating the fact that the petitioner
was involved in illegal transporting of bovine animal. It is also
(Uploaded on 02/02/2026 at 10:38:53 AM)
(Downloaded on 07/02/2026 at 12:45:51 PM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JP:4582] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-917/2026]
contended that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and
trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail
application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail
application and contended that the petitioner is a habitual offender
and against him, several cases were registered under the
provisions of Bovine Animal Act and other offences, therefore, the
bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed.
4. Heard and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the fact that the charge-sheet has already been
submitted and trial of the case may take considerable time,
therefore, without commenting anything on the merits of the case,
I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on
bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is
allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Rumal S/o
Mohammad @ Mauj Khan, in connection with FIR No. 521/2025
registered at Police Station Kaman, District Deeg, shall be
enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum
of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the
satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before
the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when
called upon to do so. The learned trial Judge shall also verify the
address and the contact details of the surety through concerned
SHO before releasing the accused-petitioner on bail.
7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence
on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned
police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed
(Uploaded on 02/02/2026 at 10:38:53 AM)
(Downloaded on 07/02/2026 at 12:45:51 PM)
##PAGE3##[2026:RJ-JP:4582] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-917/2026]
to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the
accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the
accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned Trial Court
without any delay. In case of any breach to the aforementioned
conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the
application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the
bail before the concerned Court.
8. The accused-petitioner is also directed to submit his present
address along with the mobile number to the concerned SHO
within a period of 7 days from his release and the concerned SHO
shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the
petitioner changes his address or mobile numb
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.