Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Right to Promotion is Legitimate Expectation; Marriage-Based Transfer Can't Defeat It: Himachal Pradesh High Court
12 Mar 2026
Section 4 Official Secrets Act Presumption and Prima Facie Evidence Bar Bail in Espionage Case: Punjab & Haryana HC
14 Mar 2026
Centre Revokes Wangchuk's NSA Detention Amid SC Challenge
14 Mar 2026
No Interference Allowed in Religious Prayers on Private Premises: Allahabad HC Cites Maranatha Precedent
14 Mar 2026
No Proof of Absolute Ownership by Mizo Chiefs Bars Fundamental Rights Claim Under Article 31: Supreme Court
14 Mar 2026
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
SUDESH BANSAL,
SANDEEP TANEJA
RAVINDRA SINGH LADHANA S/O SHRI PRAHLAD SINGH LADHANA – Appellant
Versus
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1676/2026 Ravindra Singh Ladhana S/o Shri Prahlad Singh Ladhana ----Petitioner Versus Rajasthan High Court ----Respondent Connected With D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1682/2026 D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1744/2026 D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1720/2026 D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1810/2026 D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1828/2026 D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1829/2026 D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1830/2026 D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1831/2026 D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1832/2026 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shovit Jhajharia, Mr. Ram Pratap Saini, Mr. Aamir Khan, Mr. G.S. Gauttam, Ms. Komal Kumari Giri, Mr. Bajrang Sepat, Mr. Laxmikant Malpura and Mr. Nikhil Kumawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vigyan Shah HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Order
31/01/2026
1. Heard respective counsels from
The direction of the High Court to increase posts reserved in General Category from unfilled posts in SC/ST is not only contradictory but also against rule that an earlier decision of a Bench of coor....
The marks obtained at various stages of the selection process are not reflective of the final merit of a candidate, but considered for further participation in the next round.
Reserved category candidates who score above the general category cut-off must be treated as general candidates, ensuring merit prevails in recruitment processes as mandated by the Constitution.
Merit must govern the selection of candidates across categories, allowing migration from reserved to open categories based on superior performance.
Merit-based selection requires inclusion of qualified candidates from reserved categories in the unreserved list at the preliminary examination stage, ensuring compliance with equality and fairness p....
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.