HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
FARJAND ALI
SURENDRA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLR / 1123 / 2025
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JD:5413]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1123/2025
Surendra Singh S/o Bhawani Singh, Aged About 42 Years,
Resident Of Village Novi Ps Sumerpur District Pali Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2. Deepak Joshi S/o Shri Mana Lal Ji, Resident Of Village
Sewadi Tehsil Bali District Pali Raj.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shamboo Singh Rathore
Mr. Chain Singh Rathore
For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Chandawat
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
30/01/2026
1. By way of filing the instant criminal revision petition, a
challenge is made to the order dated 31.05.2025 whereby the
learned trial Court ordered to frame charges against the petitioner
for commission of offence under Sections 341, 323 read with
323/34, 342 read with 342/34, 365 read with 365/34, 440 read
with 440/34, 307 read with 307/34 of IPC.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the trial
Court has committed an error of law in ordering framing of
charges against the petitioner because the requisite material was
not available on record. It is his assertion that there was no fire-
arm injury on the body of the victim Sagar Mali and, therefore, it
can be presumed that fire-arm was not used and that is why the
learned trial Court discharged the petitioner from the charge
(Uploaded on 31/01/2026 at 01:04:10 PM)
(Downloaded on 07/02/2026 at 01:30:33 PM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JD:5413] (2 of 4) [CRLR-1123/2025]
under Section 3/25 of the Arms Act. He further argued that since
there was no injury sufficient to cause death in ordinary course of
nature and the injury was not dangerous to life, therefore, no
offence under Section 307 of IPC would be attracted.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently made a
protest to the submissions made at the instance of the petitioner
and urged that for the purpose of invocation of Section 307 of IPC,
there is no need that the injury received by the victim must be
such as is likely to cause death and so also there is no
requirement of law that only if firearm injuries would be sustained,
the penal provision of Section 307 of IPC attract. He further urges
that the petitioner was discharged from Section 3/25 Arms Act for
the reason of there being no previous sanction of District
Magistrate concerned since as per Section 3 of the Arms Act, to
prosecute a person, a previous sanction is necessary and in this
case the SHO abstained from obtaining the requisite sanction,
therefore, the discharge order was passed and, therefore, the
petitioner cannot take advantage of it.
4. I have bestowed upon the submissions made at bar and the
material available on record.
5. The petitioner was discharged from the offence under
Sections 3/25 of the Arms Act solely on the ground of absence of
the requisite sanction. As per the statutory mandate, prosecution
under Sections 3/25 of the Arms Act requires prior approval of the
District Magistrate. Admittedly, no such sanction had been
obtained by the investigating agency and, therefore, the learned
Trial Court had no option but to discharge the petitioner from the
said offence. In the considered opinion of this Court, the petitioner
(Uploaded on 31/01/2026 at 01:04:10 PM)
(Downloaded on 07/02/2026 at 01:30:33 PM)
##PAGE3##[2026:RJ-JD:5413] (3 of 4) [CRLR-1123/2025]
cannot be permitted to derive any undue advantage from the said
discharge.
5.1 The victim, in his statement, has categorically alleged that
the petitioner attempted to kill him by deliberately ramming his
vehicle with a Bolero car. It has further been alleged that after the
collision, the victim was assaulted, as a consequence of which he
sustained injuries.
5.2 The site memo placed on record, along with the photographs
of the vehicle in which the victim was travelling and the
photographs of the other vehicle, clearly depict a collision between
the two vehicles. The site memo further prima facie corroborates
the version of the victim regarding the incident of vehicular
collision. The allegations of causing in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.