SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 2490

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
SURENDER KAUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 4623 / 2025



[2026:RJ-JD:4156]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4623/2025 Surender Kaur W/o Gurmeet Singh, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Chak 2 Psd, Police Station And Tehsil Rawla, District Sri Ganganagar (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Sri Ganganagar)

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Bhargava Mr. Arun Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, PP Mr. Jitendra Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

Order

22/01/2026 The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No.341/2024 registered at Police Station Rawla, District Sri Ganganagar for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s)

80(2), 85 & 3(5)of B.N.S.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case, she has nothing to do with the alleged offence(s) and she is behind the bars since 26.12.2024. Counsel further submits that petitioner is a lady & she had good relations with the parents of the deceased. Counsel further submits that the statements of 8 prosecution witnesses have been recorded out of 24 prosecution witnesses, and soon before the death of the deceased, no facts relating to dowry have emerged. Counsel further submits that the petitioner is mother-in- law of the deceased. The prosecution has not produced any evidence relating to dowry on any specific date or at any particular time. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude, till then, her further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose and she is ready and willing to furnish her bail bonds.

Therefore, the bail application deserves to be allowed.

Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant-respondent have vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the marriage of the deceased with the co-accused was solemnized on 03.12.2023, and the deceased had caused unnatural death on 21.12.2024 at her matrimonial home.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the statements of the parents of the deceased, the statement of medical expert & material made available on record.

Taking into consideration the submissions put forth, the evidence adduced during investigation/trial, custody period & the fact that petitioner is a lady and overall facts & circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

Therefore, the bail application is allowed. Accused-

petitioner, namely Surender Kaur W/o Gurmeet Singh, shall be released on bail, if she is not required in any other case, provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/-

(Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that she shall appear before that Court and any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when she is called upon to do so.

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAURABH /05

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top