[2026:RJ-JP:2930]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14255/2025 Mridul Kumar S/o Krishan Kumar, R/o House No. C-35, Prakash Nagar, Krishan Nagar, Police Station Kotwali Mathura, District Mathura (U.P.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Alwar (Raj.).

----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. N.C. Sharma Ms. Muskan Mr. J.K. Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Order

22/01/2026

1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.442/2025 registered at Police Station Rajgarh, District Alwar for the offences under Sections 317(2), 317(4), 318(2), 318(4), 112(2) & 61(2)(a) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66D Information Technology, Act.

2. Heard.

3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the case diary.

4. The allegation in the FIR is that certain persons after getting opened the bank accounts in the name of their known, have received the money for betting and then get it transferred to some other accounts.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case merely because he is a friend of Kapil Jat who is said to be the main accused. He further submits that there has never been any transaction of a single penny in the account of the accused-petitioner. He further submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 28.09.2025 and Police after completion of investigation has already submitted charge-sheet in the matter.

6. The Investigating Agency has tried to connect the accused- petitioner by showing false recovery of certain ATM cards and one i-phone of other persons. Even the Investigating Agency has not come out with any transactions by those ATM cards which have been shown to be recovered from the accused-petitioner. The Investigating Agency has not been able to search out anything against the accused-petitioner from the i-phone.

7. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that this is a king of online fraud by the accused-petitioner involving crores of rupees.

8. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and the fact that no money has been transferred in the account of the present accused-petitioner and he is judicial custody since 28.09.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

9. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /9