[2026:RJ-JP:4333]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3002/2025 Devendra Singh Son of Bhairu Lal, Aged 10 Years, Minor through his natural guardian and father Shri Bhairu Lal Son of Shri Kaluram, Resident of Gandhi Gram Second, Police Station Dooni, District Tonk. ----Appellant Versus

1. Indra Singh Son of Nand Singh Solanki, Resident of Khareda, Police Station Todaraisingh, District Tonk.

2. Vinod Kumawat Son of Ramvilas, Resident of 10, Sunita Colony, Mali Ki Dhani, Jaipur and at Present Resident of Shivdanpura, Police Station Indragarh, District Bundi.

3. Digit Godigit General Insurance Company Limited, Regional Office, Queens Corner, Fourth Floor, Scheme Rathor Nagar, Queens Road, Amrapali Marg, D-Block, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur (Rajasthan) - 302021 Through Regional Manager.

----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Sandeep Mathur, Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Virendra Agrawal, Adv.

(For Insurance Company)

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

Order

15/01/2026

1- vihykFkhZ nsosUnz flga dh vksj ls tfj;s lja {kd firk HkS:a yky }kjk ;g vihy /kkjk&173 eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e&1988 ds rgr U;k;ky; U;k;k/kh'k] eksVj;ku nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k] Vksad ¼ftls vkxs ^fo}ku vf/kdj.k* ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ }kjk Dyse ;kfpdk la[;k&254@2023] nsosUnz cuke bUnzflag o vU; esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 20-03-2025 ¼ftls vkxs ^vk{ksfir fu.kZ;^ ds uke ls lca ksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ ds fo#) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

2- vihykFkhZ nsosUnz flga }kjk tfj;s laj{kd firk HkS:a yky ds fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds le{k] Lo;a ds eksVj okgu nq?kZVuk esa vkgr gks tkus ds QyLo:i dqy 3]62]70]000@& #i;s Dyse izkIr djus grs q Dyse ;kfpdk izLrqr dh x;h FkhA fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk mDr Dyse ;kfpdk esa vihykFkhZ dks dqy 4]03]245@& #i;s dh {kfriwfrZ jkf'k e; C;kt 7 izfr'kr lkykuk dh nj ls fnyokbZ x;h gSA fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds mDr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ls O;fFkr gksdj gLrxr vihy] vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus grs q izLrqr dh x;h gSA

3- nkSjkus cgl fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZ dks oDr ?kVuk vdq'ky Jfed ekurs gq, mldh vk; ekfld vk; 7]770@& :i;s fu/kkZfjr dh tkdj =qfV dkfjr dh gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZ dks Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh vk; o`f) ckcr dksbZ {kfriwfrZ jkf'k ugha fnyokbZ xbZ gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk Hkfo"; dh izR;k'kk dh en esa] 'kkjhfjd o ekufld ihMk+ dh en esa rFkk Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh lq[k&lqfo/kk dh deh ds en esa Hkh leqfpr jkf'k ugha fnyokbZ gS rFkk vU; enksa esa Hkh vR;f/kd de jkf'k fnyokbZ x;h gS] ftuesa c<+ksrjh dh tkosA vr% vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy Lohdkj dh tkdj {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;hA

4- blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ chek daiuh dh vksj ls vihykFkhZ ds mijksDr rdksZa dk fojks/k djrs gq, fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk ikfjr fd;s x;s fu.kZ; dh iqf"V fd;s tkus rFkk vihykFkhZ dh vkjs ls lfa LFkr dh x;h vihy dks fujLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

5- nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh x;hA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

6- gLrxr ekeys dh nq?kZVuk esa vihykFkhZ dks dkfjr gqbZ pksVksa ds QyLOk:i mlds 'kjhj ij dqy 15 izfr'kr dh LFkkbZ fu;ksZX;rk vkuk ik;k x;k gSA eksVj nq?kZVuk esa vkgr O;fDr;ksa dks {kfriwfrZ fnyok;s tkus ds lanHkZ esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk vius U;kf;d n`"Vkar Anant Son of Sidheswar Dukre Vs. Pratap son of Zhampannappa Lamzane & Anr. Reported in (2018) 9 Supreme Court Cases

450, esa fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS tks fuEu izdkj ls gS %&

“12. In case of motor accidents leading to injuries and disablements, it is a well settled principle that a person must not only be compensated for his physical injury, but also for the non-pecuniary losses which he has suffered due to the injury. The claimant is entitled to be compensated for his inability to lead a full life, and enjoy those things and amenities which he would have enjoyed, but for the injuries."

"13. The purpose of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act is to fully and adequately restore the aggrieved t