SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 2710

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU
HEMLATA SATYANI – Appellant
Versus
TEJ KUMAR SINDHI – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 109/2026 Hemlata Satyani D/o Shri Chandraprakash Satyani, Aged About 35 Years, R/o- Care Of Sonu Kumar, House No.581, J.p. Nagar Naka, Madar, Tehsil District Ajmer (Raj).

----Petitioner Versus Tej Kumar Sindhi S/o Shri Virendra Kumar Sindhi, R/o House No.

F-37, Bapu Nagar, Bhilwara Raj.

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohitash Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : -----

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU

Order

14/01/2026 This misc. petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS challenging the order dated 20.11.2025 passed by the Special Judicial Magistrate (N.I. Act) Cases No.4, Bhilwara in Regular Criminal Case No.3769/2020, whereby opportunity of the petitioner to cross-examine the complainant was closed.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter was kept for cross-examination of the respondent-complainant on 20.11.2025, however, on that day petitioner’s counsel was not available and therefore, cross-examination of respondent- complainant could not be conducted. Thereupon, the trial court has closed the opportunity of the petitioner to cross-examine the respondent-complainant.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top