SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 16028

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ASHUTOSH KUMAR
TAGARAM SON OF LATE HAMIRARAM – Appellant
Versus
HANUMANRAM SON OF DUDARAM – Respondent


[2025:RJ-JP:52006]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

1. S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1876/2022

1. Tagaram Son Of Late Hamiraram, Aged 24 Years, 2. Sushila D/o Late Hamiraram, Aged 22 Years, 3. Parmesh Son Of Late Hamiraram, Aged 17 Years, 4. Pooja D/o Late Hamiraram, Aged 15 Years, Appellants No. 3 & 4 are Minor Through Natural Guardian Brother Tagaram.

All Resident Of Pabanasar Panchayat, Dangra, Jaisalmer.

----Appellants Versus

1. Hanumanram Son Of Dudaram, Aged 32 Years, Resident Of Sadram Ki Beri, Tehsil Chohtan District Barmer (Owner Vehicle Number R.J.-19-G.C.-8377)

2. United India Insurance Company Limited, Regional Office Sahara Chambers, Tonk Road, Thana Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur.

(Insurance Company Vehicle Number R.J.-19-G.C.-8377).

3. Somi Devi W/o Late Hanuman Ram, Resident Of Village Post Somala Darshan, Thana Sedwa, Gaya Chohtan, District Barmer (Raj.)

(Wife Of Deceased Driver/legal Heir Vehicle Number R.J.19-G.C.-8377).

----Respondents Connected With

2. S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1779/2022

1. Tagaram S/o Late Hamiraram, Aged 24 Years, (Son Of Deceased), 2. Sushila D/o Late Hamiraram, Aged 22 Years, (Daughter Of Deceased)

3. Parmesh S/o Late Hamiraram

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top