[2025:RJ-JP:51990]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 35/2023 Mohanlal Gurjar S/o Shri Lalaram Gurjar, Aged 19 Years, Resident Gurjaro Ki Dhani, Village Thikariya, Sanganer, District Jaipur (Raj.) 302026.

----Claimant-Appellant Versus

1. Ramesh Kumar S/o Shri Hema Ram, R/o Village Charanwas, Tehsil Nava, Police Station Chitanva, District Nagaur, (Raj.) (Driver And Owner Of Pickup No. RJ37-GA-

1319).

2. United India Insurance Company Limited, Through Regional Manager, Office Nehru Palace, Tonk Road, Jaipur (Raj.) (Insurer Of Pickup No. RJ37-GA-1319).

----Non-Claimants-Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Nishant Sharma, Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Ms. Rajani Vyas, Adv.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

Order

17/12/2025

1- vihykFkhZ }kjk izLrqr ;g vihy /kkjk 173 eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e&1988 ds rgr U;k;ky; fof'k"B U;k;k/kh'k] fizfa Vax ,oa LVs'kujh xcu izdj.k ,oa eksVj nq?kZVuk okn U;k;kf/kdj.k] t;iqj ftyk t;iqj ¼ftls vkxs ^fo}ku vf/kdj.k* ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ }kjk Dyse ;kfpdk la[;k&194@2022 ¼340@2018½] eksguyky cuke jes'k o vU; esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 22-09-2022 ¼ftls vkxs ^vk{ksfir fu.kZ;^ ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ ds fo#) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

2- vihykFkhZ }kjk fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds le{k] eksVj okgu nq?kZVuk esa Lo;a ds vkgr gks tkus ds QyLo:i dqy 38]90]000@i;s {kfriwfrZ jkf'k izkIr djus grs q Dyse ;kfpdk tfj;s izkd`frd laj{kd firk }kjk izLrqr dh x;h FkhA fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk mDr Dyse ;kfpdk dk fuLrkj.k djrs gq, ;kph dks dqy 8]85]807@& #i;s dh {kfriwfrZ jkf'k e; C;kt 06 izfr'kr lkykuk dh nj ls fnyokbZ x;h gSA fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds mDr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ls O;fFkr gksdj gLrxr vihy] vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus grs q izLrqr dh x;h gSA

3- nkSjkus cgl fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk rdZ jgk gS fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZ dh okf"kZd vk; 30]000@& #i;s fu/kkZfjr dh tkdj =qfV dkfjr dh xbZ gS] tcfd oDr ?kVuk vihykFkhZ dks dq'ky Jfed dh Js.kh esa j[kk tkdj mldh ekfld vk; dh x.kuk visf{kr FkhA nq?kZVuk esa vihykFkhZ 'kjhj ij dbZ xaHkhj pksVsa dkfjr gqbZ gS] ftuds lkewfgd izHkko ls mlds 'kjhj ij dqy 100 izfr'kr LFkk;h fu;ksZX;rk vkuk ik;k x;k gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh lq[k&lqfo/kk dh deh ds en esa dksbZ jkf'k ugha fnyokbZ xbZ gS rFkk vU; enksa esa Hkh vR;f/kd de jkf'k fnyokbZ x;h gS] ftuesa c<+ksrjh dh tkosA vr% vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy Lohdkj dh tkdj {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;hA

4- blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ chek dEiuh dh vksj ls mijksDr rdkZsa dk fojks/k djrs gq, fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds fu.kZ; dh iqf"V fd;s tkus rFkk vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls lafLFkr dh x;h vihy dks [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;hA

5- nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh x;hA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

6- ekeys dh nq?kZVuk esa vihykFkhZ dks dkfjr gqbZ lk/kkj.k o xaHkhj pksVksa ds QyLo:i vihykFkhZ ds 'kjhj ij dqy 100 izfr'kr LFkk;h fu;ksZX;rk vkuk ik;k x;k gSA eksVj nq?kZVuk esa vkgr O;fDr;ksa dks {kfriwfrZ fnyok;s tkus ds lanHkZ esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk vius U;kf;d n`"Vkar Anant Son of Sidheswar Dukre Vs. Pratap Son of Zhampannappa Lamzane & Anr. reported in (2018) 9 esa fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS tks fuEu Supreme Court Cases 450, izdkj ls gS %&

“12. In case of motor accidents leading to injuries and disablements, it is a well settled principle that a person must not only be compensated for his physical injury, but also for the non-pecuniary losses which he has suffered due to the injury. The claimant is entitled to be compensated for his inability to lead a full life, and enjoy those things and amenities which he would have enjoyed, but for the injuries.

13. The purpose of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act is to fully and adequately restore the aggrieved to the position prior to the accident. This Court in Yadava Kumar v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. explained “just compensation” in the following words:

15. It goes without saying that in matters of determination of compensation both the tribunal and t