SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 16142

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ASHUTOSH KUMAR
TINKU SINGH S/O SHRI BHANWARLAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 15650 / 2025



[2025:RJ-JP:50814]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15650/2025 Tinku Singh S/o Shri Bhanwarlal, R/o House No. 59, B.P.L. Colony, Devnagar, Ajmer Presently Lohagal, Makadwali Road, Police Station Christianganj, Ajmer (Raj.)

(Presently Confined At District Jail Ajmer (Raj.)

----Accused-Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Vishal Gurjar, Adv. with Ms. Vaishnavi, Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, Dy.GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

Order

16/12/2025

1. The present bail application has been filed by the accused- applicant under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 in connection with FIR No. 259/2025, registered at Police Station Ramganj, District Ajmer for the offences punishable under Sections 8/20, 8/21 and 8/22 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'NDPS Act') by which the bail application of the accused-applicant under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has falsely been implicated in this matter. Learned counsel argues that as per the prosecution case, 18.91 grams of MD powder has been alleged to be recovered from the possession of the accused-applicant and the commercial quantity of the contraband is 50 grams, therefore, the alleged recovery of MD powder is much less than the commercial quantity. Learned counsel also argues that the accused-applicant was arrested on 09.09.2025 and since then, he is behind the bars. Learned counsel contends that no other case of similar nature has been registered against the accused-applicant. Learned counsel prays that the investigation and trial will take long time to conclude, therefore, the accused-applicant be enlarged on bail.

3. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and submits that eight other criminal cases have also been registered against the accused-applicant, therefore, his bail application should be rejected.

4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the material available on record.

5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case; that the alleged recovery of contraband is much less than the commercial quantity; that the accused-applicant is behind the bars since 09.09.2025; that other criminal cases registered against the accused-applicant are under the Excise Act and no case of similar nature under NDPS Act has been registered and that the investigation and trial will take long time to conclude, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it proper to allow the bail application filed by the accused-applicant.

6. Consequently, this bail application filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 is allowed. It is ordered that accused-applicant Tinku Singh S/o Shri Bhanwarlal, arrested in FIR No. 259/2025, registered at Police Station Ramganj, District Ajmer shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and two solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/-

each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.

7. The accused-applicant shall be required to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J Mohita /241

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top