[2025:RJ-JP:51899]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3565/2014 Deva Ram S/o Sh. Mansa Ram, R/o 26, Nadawali Dhani, Aidan ka bas, Tehsil Phulera, District Jaipur through his wife and vad- mitra Smt. Sajna W/o Devaram, R/o 26, Nadawali Dhani, Aidan Ka bas, Tehsil Phulera, District Jaipur.

----Appellant Versus

1. Jagu Khan S/o Nanu Khan, R/o Bhawanipura, Tehsil Parbatsar, District Nagaur.

(Driver Vehicle Truck No. RJ-37-GA-1803)

2. Munna Ahmed S/o Farooq Ahmed, R/o near Jama Masjid, Makrana, District Nagaur.

(Owner Vehicle Truck No. RJ-37-GA-1803)

3. Cholamandalam M.S. General Insurance Company Ltd.

through Regional Manager E-52, Second Floor, ARG Building, Chitranjan Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur.

(Insurance Company Truck No. RJ-37-GA-1803)

----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Bhanu Prakash Verma, Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chandradeep Singh Jodha, Adv.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

Order

10/12/2025

1- vihykFkhZ nsokjke dh vksj ls ;g vihy /kkjk&173 eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e&1988 ds rgr U;k;ky; eksVj nq?kZVuk okn U;k;kf/kdj.k] lkaHkjysd] ftyk t;iqj ¼ftls vkxs ^fo}ku vf/kdj.k* ds uke ls lca ksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ }kjk Dyse ;kfpdk la[;k&187@2012] nsokjke cuke txq[kku oxSjk esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 08-05-2014 ¼ftls vkxs ^vk{ksfir fu.kZ;^ ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ ds fo#) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

2- vihykFkhZ us fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds le{k] Lo;a ds eksVj okgu nq?kZVuk esa vkgr gks tkus ds QyLo:i dqy 32]85]000@& #i;s Dyse izkIr djus gsrq Dyse ;kfpdk izLrqr dh x;h FkhA fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk mDr Dyse ;kfpdk esa vihykFkhZ dks dqy 9]41]676@& #i;s dh {kfriwfrZ jkf'k e; C;kt 09 izfr'kr lkykuk dh nj ls fnyokbZ x;h gSA fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds mDr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ls O;fFkr gksdj gLrxr vihy] vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus gsrq izLrqr dh x;h gSA

3- nkSjkus cgl fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZ dh vk; nq?kZVuk ds le; izpfyr U;uw re etnwjh ds vk/kkj ij 3]500@& :i;s ekfld fu/kkZfjr dh tkdj =qfV dkfjr dh xbZ gS] tcfd oDr nq?kZVuk vihykFkhZ dkjhxj dk dk;Z djds 15]000@& :i;s ekfld vk; vftZr djrk FkkA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZx.k dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZ dks Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh vk; o`f) ckcr dksbZ {kfriwfrZ jkf'k ugha fnyokbZ xbZ gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk 'kkjhfjd o ekufld ihMk+ dh en esa rFkk Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh lq[k&lqfo/kk dh deh ds en esa Hkh leqfpr jkf'k ugha fnyokbZ gS rFkk vU; enksa esa Hkh vR;f/kd de jkf'k fnyokbZ x;h gS] ftuesa c<+ksrjh dh tkosA vr% vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy Lohdkj dh tkdj {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;hA

4- blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ chek daiuh dh vksj ls vihykFkhZ ds mijksDr rdksZa dk fojks/k djrs gq, fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk ikfjr fd;s x;s fu.kZ; dh iqf"V fd;s tkus rFkk vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls lfa LFkr dh x;h vihy dks fujLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

5- nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh x;hA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

6- gLrxr ekeys dh nq?kZVuk esa vihykFkhZ dks dkfjr gqbZ pksVksa ds QyLOk:i mlds 'kjhj ij dqy 100 izfr'kr dh LFkkbZ fu;ksZX;rk vkuk ik;k x;k gSA eksVj nq?kZVuk esa vkgr O;fDr;ksa dks {kfriwfrZ fnyok;s tkus ds lanHkZ esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk vius U;kf;d n`"Vkar Anant Son of Sidheswar Dukre Vs. Pratap son of Zhampannappa Lamzane & Anr. Reported in (2018) 9 Supreme Court Cases

450, esa fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS tks fuEu izdkj ls gS %&

“12. In case of motor accidents leading to injuries and disablements, it is a well settled principle that a person must not only be compensated for his physical injury, but also for the non-pecuniary losses which he has suffered due to the injury. The claimant is entitled to be compensated for his inability to lead a full life, and enjoy those things and amenities which he would have enjoyed, but for the injuries."

"13. The purpose of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act is to fully and adequately restore the aggrieved to the position prior to the accident. This Court in Yadava Kumar v. N