[2025:RJ-JP:46969]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17146/2025 Deen Dayal S/o Shri Karan Singh, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Vpo Bijoli, Tehsil Bari District Dholpur, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt.

Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.

3. The Dy Director-Cum-Chief District Education Officer, Dholpur

4. The District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Dholpur.

5. The Chief Block Education Officer, Bari, District Dholpur.

6. Director, Pension And Pensioners Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Ms.

Khushboo Gaur For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishal Kumar & Ms. Pooja Sharma for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG Ms. Saba Naaz & Mr. Aaditya Godara, AAAG for Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN

Order

20/11/2025

1. Mr. Vishal Kumar & Ms. Pooja Sharma on behalf of Mr. Manoj 2. Mr. Aaditya Godara, AAAG on behalf of Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG

3. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-

“It is, therefore, humbly prayed that your Lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition with costs and further be pleased to direct the Respondents to the following effect:

i) Respondents may kindly be directed to make the payment of due 4 days leave encashment as per provision of Rules because out of 299 days he has been paid only 295 days leave encashment, which are pending till date along with interest @ 9% p.a. till the date of actual payment made to the petitioner by respondents;

ii. Respondents may further be directed to pay interest on the delayed retiral benefits of leave encashment @ 9% p.a. as per provision of Rule 89 of the Rajasthan Pension Rules, 1996.

iii. Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.”

4. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances.

5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.

6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J Chetna/34