SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 16348

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
PRADEEP KUMAR S/O SUBHASHCHAND – Appellant
Versus
SURESH KUMAR S/O KANARAM – Respondent


[2025:RJ-JP:46448]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3620/2025 Pradeep Kumar S/o Subhashchand, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Dahina, District Rewari (Haryana)

----Petitioner Versus Suresh Kumar S/o Kanaram, R/o Dhani Goruwala, Tan Chirani, Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu.

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Vikram Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr.Amit Punia, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND

Order

18/11/2025

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 challenging the order dated 07.05.2025 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge No.1, Khetri, District Jhunjhunu (hereinafter referred to as, "the Appellate Court") whereby the Appellate Court while allowing the application filed by the petitioner for suspension of sentence in a pending appeal against the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as, "the NI Act") has imposed a condition on the petitioner to deposit 20% of the fine amount.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Appellate Court was not justified in directing the petitioner to deposit 20% of the fine amount be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top