HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
Nupur Bhati, J
Satyapal Singh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2506/2019
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. request for exemption from repeat probation and counting of past service for same post. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. matter covered by previous court decisions in similar facts. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. direction to the authority to decide the representation as per law and precedent. (Para 5 , 6) |
Order
03/02/2026
1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following
prayers:-
“(i) By an appropriate writ order or direction, the
respondents may kindly be directed not to compel the
petitioner to undergo probation period of two years
once again for the same post i.e. Teacher Grade-III
Level-1 in pursuant to the order dated 13.02.2019
(Annexure-4).
(ii) By an appropriate writ order or direction, the
respondents may kindly be directed to relieve the
petitioner after due procedure and while giving benefits
of past service and the respondents may kindly be
directed to transfer the Employee-ID of the petitioner
and to issue L.P.C. and to send the Service Book of the
petitioner after completing the entries to the present
appointing authority of the petitioner.
(iii) By an appropriate writ order or direction, that the
respondents may kindly be directed to relive the
petitioner from last joining post to join newly allotted
post and to with counting of past service of the
petitioner which he served during his last post in
pursuance of advertisement 2016.
(iv) Any other relief which the Hon'ble Court considers
just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the
case may kindly be granted in favour of the petitioner.
(v) Costs of the writ petition may kindly be awarded to
the petitioner.”
2. Brief facts of the case, as stated in the writ petition, are that
the petitioner, after due process of selection, was appointed as
Teacher Grade-III Level-I vide appointment order dated
05.10.2017 and was posted at Government Primary School,
Kamrudeen Ki Dhani, Panchayat Samiti Kalyanpur, District Barmer.
Pursuant thereto, the Block Elementary Education Officer,
Kalyanpur directed the concerned Headmaster to permit the
petitioner to join, and accordingly, the petitioner joined his duties
on 07.10.2017. Subsequently, the Block Development Officer,
(Uploaded on 03/02/2026 at 04:27:32 PM)
(Downloaded on 10/02/2026 at 12:37:47 AM)
[2026:RJ-JD:5989] (3 of 4) [CW-2506/2019]
Panchayat Samiti issued an order dated 13.02.2019 pursuant to
the allotment made by Zila Parishad, Ajmer, directing the
petitioner to join at the newly allotted place by 28.02.2019, failing
which his candidature was liable to be rejected. It is relevant to
note that vide letters dated 12.02.2019, the respondents clarified
that joining was to be permitted only to those candidates who had
obtained NOC from the concerned department on or before the
last date of application, i.e., 07.05.2018. The petitioner fulfills the
said condition, having obtained the requisite NOC within the
stipulated time. As the petitioner is already serving on the same
post and is nearing completion of his probation period, he applied
for being relieved to enable him to join at the newly allotted post.
However, the respondents have neither relieved the petitioner nor
acted upon his application and are instead compelling him to
resign, which would result in forfeiture of his past service.
Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner has approached this Hon’ble
Court.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the very outset submits
that the issue involved in the writ petition is squarely covered by
the order dated 11.12.2024 passed by the Coordinate Bench of
this Court in SBCWP No.20453/2024 : Preeti Prahladka Vs. State
of Rajasthan & Ors., wherein, the writ petition was disposed of
with a direction to the competent authority to decide the
petitioner’s representation in accordance with law, keeping in view
the judgment in Dhanraj Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
(S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12846/2017).
4. Learned counsel for the respondents is not in a position to
controvert the said submission.
(Uploaded on 03/02/2026 at 04:27:32 PM)
(Downloaded on 10/02/2026 at 12:37:47 AM)
[2026:RJ-JD:598
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.