##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JD:6253]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10386/2025

Banshi Ram S/o Shri Amara Ram, Aged About 65 Years, R/o

Paldi Kalan, Tehsil Degana, District Nagaur (Raj.).

----Petitioner

Versus

1. Pema Ram S/o Shri Chhagan Lal, R/o Bikharniya Khurd,

Tehsil Degana, District Nagaur (Raj.).

2. Jora Ram S/o Shri Parma Ram, R/o Paldi Kalan, Tehsil

Degana, District Nagaur (Raj.).

3. Bhika Ram S/o Shri Choutha Ram, R/o Paldi Kalan, Tehsil

Degana, District Nagaur (Raj.).

4. Rampyari D/o Shri Choutha Ram, R/o Paldi Kalan, Tehsil

Degana, District Nagaur (Raj.).

5. Munni D/o Choutha Ram, R/o Paldi Kalan, Tehsil Degana,

District Nagaur (Raj.).

6. Tehsildar, Degana, District Nagaur (Raj.).

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohitash Singh Rathore

For Respondent(s) : -

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT

Order

03/02/2026

1. Present writ petition is filed praying for following reliefs:

“(i) The order dated 07/11/2024 (Annexure-7)

passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Officer,

Degana, District Nagaur, in revenue suit no.

102/2017 titled as Pema Ram versus Bhika Ram &

others by which application of the petitioner-

defendant was rejected, filed for restoring the

previous position of the land in the revenue record

which exist on the date of filing the revenue suit,

after removing/deleting the entries which were

recorded in compliance of the judgment & decree

(Uploaded on 04/02/2026 at 05:36:20 PM)

(Downloaded on 10/02/2026 at 12:57:14 AM)

[2026:RJ-JD:6253] (2 of 5) [CW-10386/2025]

dated 30/07/2018 (Annexure-1), may kindly be

quashed and set aside.

(ii). The Learned court of SDO Degana may kindly be

directed to restore the previous position of the land

of kahasra no. 394 of the village Paldi Kalan, Tehsil

Degana, District Nagaur, in the revenue record which

exist on the date of filing the revenue suit, after

removing/deleting the entries which were recorded in

compliance of the judgment & decree dated

30/07/2018.

(ii). Pass any other order or direction, which this

Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the facts and

circumstances of the case, in favour of the petitioner.

(iv). Allow cost of the writ petition to the

petitioners.”

2. Explaining facts of the present case, learned counsel for

petitioner stated that respondent no. 1/plaintiff - Pema Ram filed a

Revenue Suit No. 102/2017 for partition of land in dispute and

same was decreed by the Court of Assistant Collector – Sub

Divisional Officer (“SDO”), Degana vide judgment dated

30.07.2018 and specific directions were issued to Tehsildar,

Degana to incorporate necessary mutation entries in view of the

report prepared by concerned Patwari. In pursuance of the same,

revenue records were updated by Tehsildar, Degana.

2.1 Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that petitioner,

having purchased a part of land in dispute from one Jora Ram,

during the pendency of the said suit proceedings, vide registered

sale deed dated 14.03.2018, challenged judgment and decree

dated 30.07.2018 along with his vendor – Jora Ram before

Revenue Appellate Authority (“RRA”), Nagaur, whereby RRA,

Nagaur has, vide its judgment dated 21.01.2020, set aside order

dated 30.07.2018 and remanded the matter to the Court of SDO,

(Uploaded on 04/02/2026 at 05:36:20 PM)

(Downloaded on 10/02/2026 at 12:57:14 AM)

[2026:RJ-JD:6253] (3 of 5) [CW-10386/2025]

Degana for fresh adjudication. Said order was later on upheld by

the Board of Revenue, Ajmer (“BOR”) also.

2.2 In these circumstances, petitioner preferred an application

before the Court of SDO, Degana praying for a direction to be

issued to Tehsildar, Degana to restore revenue entries to the

position as existed before the passing of judgment and decree

dated 30.07.2018.

2.3 Said application was contested on behalf of respondents on

the grounds that no specific direction was given to SDO, Degana

in the remand order for the alteration of the revenue record.

2.4 SDO, Degana, while considering the material available on

record, rejected application of petitioner vide its order dated

07.11.2