[2026:RJ-JP:5954]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 1192/2026 Sunny Kumar Sharma S/o Rajkishore Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Naki, Lochi, Police Station Haveli Khadagpur, District Munger, Bihar, Presently H. No. 53, First Floor, Kadagrahara Road, Kammasandra, Bidarahalli, Hobble, Police Station Avalahlli, Bengaluru, Karnataka (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur)

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 1892/2026 Bhupesh Fagedia S/o Shri Bhagirath Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Ramsinghpura, Police Station Bisau, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.

(At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur).

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gajveer Singh Rajawat Mr. Jaswant Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP Mr. Sugan Singh, Dy. S.P., Jaipur HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

Order

09/02/2026

1. These instant second bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused- petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 4/2025 registered at Cyber Police Station (ATS & SOG) District ATS & SOG for the offences under Sections 308(6), 318(4), 319(2), 111(4)

and 204 BNS and Section 66-D of IT Act.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is argued that petitioners have been discharged under Section 111(4) of the BNS. It is also contended that no amount was transferred in the account of petitioners. There is no other reliable evidence available on the record that petitioners alongwith the other co-accused hatched conspiracy and committed cyber fraud. The first bail application of the accused-petitioner was dismissed by this court vide order dated 23.09.2025, thereafter the trial court has proceeded with the trial including discharging the petitioners for the offence under Section 111(4) of the BNS. The accused-petitioners are young boys. It is contended that petitioners are in custody since 04.07.2025 and 16.06.025 and record itself is voluminous. The trial of the case may take considerable time. The matter has already been committed to the Magistrate for conducting trial, therefore the bail applications of the accused petitioners may be allowed.

3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications and contended that petitioners' first bail application was dismissed by this court on merits, observing that petitioners alongwith the other co-accused hatched conspiracy and thereafter huge amount was transferred from complainant's account in various accounts. The police after investigation found petitioners presence with the other co-accused who were responsible for committing cyber fraud, the huge amount of Rs. 23,56,000/- was transferred from complainant account to other accounts, there is complaint already pending against petitioner in Cyber Crime Sonipat police station bearing No. 30/25 and in Delhi bearing No. 16/25 and 17/2025, therefore considering the aforesaid fact, the bail applications of accused petitioners deserves to be dismissed.

4. Heard and perused the material available on record.

5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case. This court has already dealt with the merits, indicating petitioners' involvement in the alleged crime on the basis of the investigation and factual report submitted before it, therefore, Without commenting anything on the merits of the case, this court is not inclined to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.

6. Accordingly, the second bail applications of the accused-

petitioners are hereby dismissed.

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /1-2