[2026:RJ-JP:6062]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2332/2026

1. Pappu S/o Chandan, R/o Mahara Ka Pura, Thana Saipau, District Dholpur.

2. Mahesh S/o Ramu, R/o Rajapura, Thana Kanchanpur, District Dholpur ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Mayank HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA

Order

09/02/2026

1. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioners under Section 482 of B.N.S.S (438 of Cr.P.C.) in connection with F.I.R. No.4/2024 registered at Police Station Bari, District Dholpur for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 420 & 379 of IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case as they have nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submits that the allegations levelled in the FIR, relate to forgery of Rs.1,00,000/-. Learned counsel also submits that in order to resolve their disputes amicably, the petitioners and complainant have voluntarily entered into a compromise dated 02.01.2026, by which the complainant has been refunded the entire alleged amount by the petitioners, so custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not required. Hence, the petitioners may be given the benefit of anticipatory bail under Section 482 of BNSS.

3. Learned counsel for the complainant admits the fact of having entered into compromise with the petitioners. He further submits that the complainant has no objection if the petitioners are given the benefit of the anticipatory bail.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners hereinabove.

5. Taking into consideration the overall facts & circumstances of the case; the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, the fact that the case is triable by Magistrate and parties have already entered into compromise, as well as trial will take considerable time in its conclusion, without commenting anything upon the merits /demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail.

6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of accused-petitioners namely, Pappu S/o Chandan and Mahesh S/o Ramu, in connection with FIR No.04/2024 registered at Police Station Bari, District Dholpur, they shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the SHO/IO/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

(i) The accused-petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required.

(ii) The accused-petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court.

(SANDEEP TANEJA),J AVINASH GULERIA /60