SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 3517

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
AMRIT LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 6126 / 2025



[2026:RJ-JD:8099]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6126/2025 Amrit Lal S/o Shri Raisingh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Narayani, Choti Sadri Police Station, District Pratapgarh. (Lodged In District Jail, Pali)

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Raj Bishnoi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Urja Ram Kalbi, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

Order

12/02/2026

1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.250/2023 registered at Police Station Rohat, District Pali for offence under Sections 8/15, 29 of NDPS Act.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that as per the prosecution story, 1 quintal 75 Kg. Poppy-straw has been recovered from the conscious possession of co-accused Ganesh and on the basis of disclosure statement of co-accused, petitioner has been impleaded in this case. He again submits that in the present matter, allegations include that vehicle was escorted by co-accused Satyaprakash and Smt. Keshar and the contraband was supplied by the present petitioner. He further argued that nothing has been recovered from the present petitioner and there is lack of link evidence, call details or any whatsapp chat connectivity. He also submits that the co-accused Satyaprakash and Smt. Keshar have been enlarged on bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court on 03.12.2025 and 17.11.2025 respectively. He further submits that as per the testimony of Investigating Officer recorded during cross-examination, the mobile number mentioned in Exhibit P-20 does not belongs to any of the accused and no call detail, text message or location has been found in the name of the accused-petitioner. Though six cases have been reported against the petitioner, but in all that cases, he is on bail. He further submits that the petitioner is behind the bars since 21.05.2024 and charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time and no further custodial interrogation is required, hence on the ground of parity, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner especially on the ground of parity but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Amrit Lal S/o Shri Raisingh, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

1-amit/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top