SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 3594

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
SANDEEP TANEJA
UMRAO MAL S/O DULHARAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 16898 / 2025



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16898/2025 Umrao Mal S/o Dulharam, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Plot No. 100, Shivshakti Nagar, At Present Tenant Of Plot No. 101 House No. 205, Girraj Nagar, Mansarovar, P.s. Muhana, District Jaipur (Raj.) (Presently Lodged At Sever Jail Bharatpur).

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shri Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA

Order

11/02/2026 I. A. No. 1/2026

1. The matter comes upon an application filed on behalf of petitioner Umrao Mal for grant of interim bail to attend the marriage of his niece.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the marriage of petitioner’s real niece is going to be solemnized on 13.02.2026. In support of his contentions, wedding card has also been annexed to this interim bail application. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to furnish bail bonds for his interim release, hence, the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of interim bail for a period of thirty days.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the interim bail application. However, he submits a report dated 11.02.2026 given by SHO of the concerned police station confirming the fact of marriage of petitioner’s niece on 13.02.2026.

4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

5. Looking to the totality of facts and circumstances of the case and after going through all the documents related to the marriage of the petitioner’s niece, a humanitarian approach is required to be adopted so as to enable petitioner to attend the marriage of his niece, thus, this Court deems it just and proper to grant interim bail to the accused-petitioner for two days i.e. 12.02.2026 and

13.02.2026.

6. Accordingly, this interim bail application is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Umrao Mal S/o Dulharam, shall be enlarged on interim bail for two days i.e. 12.02.2026 and 13.02.2026, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, out of which one surety shall be a closed relative of accused-petitioner, to the satisfaction of the Superintendent, Sevar Jail, Bharatpur with the condition that he shall maintain peace and good behavior during the period of interim bail and shall not commit any offence.

7. The accused-petitioner shall surrender himself before the Superintendent of the concerned Jail Authority, on 14.02.2026 by

5:00 PM.

8. If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned Jail Authority as directed above, the Jail Authority shall be free to take action against him in accordance with law.

9. Learned Public Prosecutor is directed to submit a report of concerned Superintendent of Jail Authority, regarding surrender of the petitioner, before this Court.

10. Let a copy of this order be supplied to the concerned Jail Authorities.

11. List this bail application on 16.02.2026.

(SANDEEP TANEJA),J SKS/19

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top