HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1841/2026 Smt. Sajjana Choudhary W/o Shri Vijay Singh Choudhary ----Petitioner Versus Ajmer Development Authority, Ajmer & Anr.

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ishwar Lal Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.D. Gathala, AGC Mr. Tanishq Jhavery for Mr. Divanshu Gupta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI

Order

11/02/2026 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon an order dated 07.04.2025, passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4933/2025 titled as Nawal Singh Rathore Vs. Ajmer Development Authority and Others, which reads as under:-

“1. Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners submits that petitioners are in established and peaceful possession since long and entitled for regularization of their possession, however, while declining the regularization, they have been sought to be dispossessed and the pakka construction has been sought to be demolished by the Ajmer Development Authority, hence, instant writ petitions.

2. It has been pointed out that the identical issue is involved in another writ petitions, which are pending before this Court where the possession and construction of the then petitioners has been protected.

3. Heard.

4. Issue notice to respondents.

5. On behalf of respondents- Ajmer Development Authority, counsel has put in appearance as Caveator and accept notices.

6. Let notices be issued to remaining respondents.

7. In the meanwhile, status quo in respect of possession and construction of the subject properties, as it exists today, shall be maintained.

8. However, respondent-Ajmer Development Authority is at liberty to move application for vacation of stay order, after filing of the reply or in changed circumstances.

9. List these matters along with SB CWP No. 2438/2025 and other connected matters.”

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that case of the petitioner is similar to the above mentioned case relied upon by him and thus, the protection granted by the Court vide order dated 07.04.2025, be granted to the present petitioner as well.

Considering the submissions made, issue notice to the respondents.

Mr. Tanishq Jhavery, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Divanshu Gupta, Advocate, puts in appearance on behalf of respondent No.1.

Mr. V.D. Gathala, learned Assistant Government Counsel, accepts notices on behalf of respondent No.2. Hence, service is complete and notices need not be filed.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve a copy of petition in the Offices of Mr. V.D. Gathala, learned AGC appearing for respondent No.2 and Mr. Divanshu Gupta, Advocate, who appears for respondent No.1.

Names of Mr. V.D. Gathala, learned AGC and Mr. Divanshu Gupta, Advocate, be shown in the cause list.

Learned counsel for the respondent seek some time to file reply to the writ petition, which is granted.

In the meanwhile and till further orders, status quo in respect of possession and construction of the said property as it exists today shall be maintained. However, respondents would be at liberty to file an application seeking vacation/modification of this order, if so advised.

List the matter along with S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4933/2025.

(ANUROOP SINGHI),J JAYANT KUMAR /05