[2025:RJ-JP:50601]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 6386/2019 eqds'k pan eh.kk iq= Jh jkeukFk eh.kk] mez 25 o"kZ] fuoklh& xzke fMxkfj;k] VIik dkys'oj] Fkkuk dksyok] ftyk nkSlk] gky fdjk;snkj& edku ua- 99] Jhjke okfVdk] VksMh gjekMk] iqfyl Fkkuk gjekMk] ftyk t;iqjA izkFkhZ@vihykFkhZ ---- cuke

d`".k dqekj 'kekZ iq= Jh ca'kh/kj] fuoklh&tklMkork dh

1.

xzke uhanM] iqfyl Fkkuk gjekMk] ftyk t;iqjA ¼okgu pkyd eksVjlkbZfdy ua- ½ RJ-14-DK-1003 gsejkt iq= Jh izHkkrhyky czkã.k] fuoklh& 618] ukF;kokyh

2.

¼okgu Lokeh ,oa chek/kkjd eksVjlkbZfdy ua- ½ RJ-14-DK-1003 nh U;w bf.M;k ,';ksjsal dEiuh fy- tfj;s 'kk[kk izcU/kd 'kk[kk

3.

lsaVj] Fkkuk 'kkL=h uxj] t;iqj ¼jft-½ ¼okgu chek daiuh eksVjlkbZfdy ua- ½ RJ-14-DK-1003 vizkFkhZx.k ----

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Bhanu Prakash Verma, Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ram Singh Rathore, Adv. (For Insurance Company)

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

Order

04/12/2025

1- vihykFkhZ eqds’k pUn eh.kk }kjk ;g vihy /kkjk 173 eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e&1988 ds rgr U;k;ky; eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k] la[;k&01] t;iqj egkuxj] t;iqj ¼ftls vkxs ^fo}ku vf/kdj.k* ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ }kjk Dyse ;kfpdk la[;k&27@2018] eqds’k pUn eh.kk cuke d`".k dqekj oxSjk esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 17-08-2019 ds fo#)

izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

2- vihykFkhZ eqds’k pan eh.kk }kjk fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds le{k] Lo;a ds eksVj okgu nq?kZVuk esa vkgr gks tkus ds QyLo:i dqy 31]10]000@&

#i;s Dyse izkIr djus grs q Dyse ;kfpdk izLrqr dh x;h FkhA fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk mDr Dyse ;kfpdk esa ;kph dks dqy 80]000@& #i;s dh {kfriwfrZ jkf’k e; C;kt 7 izfr’kr lkykuk dh nj ls fnyokbZ x;h gSA fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds mDr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ls O;fFkr gksdj gLrxr vihy] vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus grs q izLrqr dh x;h gSA

3- nkSjkus cgl fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk rdZ jgk fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vkgr dks vk; dh {kfr dh en esa xq.kd ds vk/kkj ij {kfriwfrZ jkf’k ugha fnyokbZ tkdj =qfV dkfjr dh xbZ gS] tcfd oDr ?kVuk vihykFkhZ izkbZosV dk;Z dj 15]000@& ekfld vk; vftZr djrk FkkA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk Hkfo"; dh izR;k'kk dh en esa] 'kkjhfjd o ekufld ihMk+ dh en esa rFkk Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh lq[k&lqfo/kk dh deh ds en esa Hkh leqfpr jkf'k ugha fnyokbZ gS rFkk vU; enksa esa Hkh vR;f/kd de jkf'k fnyokbZ x;h gS] ftuesa c<+ksrjh dh tkosA vr% vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy Lohdkj dh tkdj {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;hA

4- blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ chek dEiuh dh vksj ls vihykFkhZ ds mijksDr rdksZa dk fojks/k djrs gq, fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk ikfjr fd;s x;s fu.kZ; dh iqf"V fd;s tkus rFkk vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls lfa LFkr dh x;h vihy dks fujLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

5- nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh x;hA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

6- eksVj nq?kZVuk esa vkgr O;fDr;ksa dks {kfriwfrZ fnyok;s tkus ds lna HkZ esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk vius U;kf;d n`"Vkar Anant Son of Sidheswar Dukre Vs. Pratap son of Zhampannappa Lamzane & Anr. Reported in (2018) 9 Supreme Court Cases

450, esa fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS tks fuEu izdkj ls gS %&

“12. In case of motor accidents leading to injuries and disablements, it is a well settled principle that a person must not only be compensated for his physical injury, but also for the non-pecuniary losses which he has suffered due to the injury. The claimant is entitled to be compensated for his inability to lead a full life, and enjoy those things and amenities which he would have enjoyed, but for the injuries."

"13. The purpose of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act is to fully and adequately restore the aggrieved to the position prior to the accident. This Court in Yadava Kumar v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. explained “just compensation” in the following words:"

"15. It goes without saying that in matters of determination of compensation both the tribunal and the court are statutorily charged with a responsibility of fixing a “just compensation”. It is obviously true that determination of a just compensation cannot be equated t