2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 16565
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ASHUTOSH KUMAR
ABDUL WAHED KHAN ALAIS WAHID KHAN – Appellant
Versus
DAVENDRA SINGH JADOON S/O SHRI DEEWAN SINGH JADAUN – Respondent
CMA / 2565 / 2025
[2025:RJ-JP:50680]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2565/2025 vCnqy oghn [kku mQZ oghn [ku iq= gehn 'kkg mQZ gehn [kku] vk;q 34 o"kZ] fuoklh& eqfLye eksgYyk] ekuqij] iqfyl Fkkuk&ekuiqj] ftyk nkSlk&jkt- gky fuoklh& t;Urh uxj] vkxjk jksM] dkuksrk] t;iqjA izkFkhZ@vihykFkhZ ---- cuke nsosUnz flga tknkSu iq= Jh nhoku flag tknkSu] fuoklh& >kjhyk]
1.
Fkkuk e.Mjk;y] ftyk djkSyh] gky fuoklh& 92] ef.kjRue~
fogkj] vkxjk jksM] tkeMksyh] iqfyl Fkkuk dkuksrk] t;iqjA ¼pkyd okgu dkj vLFkkbZ ua- ] LFkk;h ua-
RJ-14-PC-1039 RJ-14-
½ UG-9905 nhid flga iq= Jh lqjsUnz flga ] fuoklh& 92] ef.kjRue~ fogkj]
2.
vkxjk jksM] tkeMksyh] iqfyl Fkkuk dkuksrk] t;iqjA ¼Lokeh okgu dkj vLFkkbZ ua- ] LFkk;h ua-
RJ-14-PC-1039 RJ-14-
½ UG-9905 jkW;y lqUnje vyk;Ul ba';ksjsUl dEiuh fyfeVsM] tfj;s izcU/kd]
3.
dk;kZy; irk& 6 Q~yksj] f=ewfrZ fot; VkWoj] vfgalk lfdZy]
iqfyl Fkkuk&v'kksd uxj] t;iqjA ¼chek dEiuh okgu dkj vLFkkbZ ua- ] LFkk;h ua-
RJ-14-PC-1039 ½ RJ-14-UG-9905 foi{khx.k@vizkFkhZx.k ----
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Bhanu Prakash Verma, Adv.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chanderdeep Singh, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Order
04/12/2025
1- vihykFkhZ }kjk ;g vihy /kkjk 173 eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e&1988 ds rgr U;k;ky; jktLFkku jkT; lgdkjh vf/kdj.k ,oa eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok U;k;kf/kdj.k] t;iqj egkuxj&izFke] t;iqj ¼ftls vkxs ^fo}ku vf/kdj.k* ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ }kjk Dyse ;kfpdk l[a ;k&92@2023] vCnqy oghn cuke nsosUnz flga o vU; esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 17-02-2025 ¼ftls vkxs ^vk{ksfir fu.kZ;^ ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ ds fo#)
izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
2- vihykFkhZ }kjk fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds le{k] eksVj okgu nq?kZVuk esa Lo;a ds vkgr gks tkus ds QyLo:i dqy 60]70]000@& #i;s Dyse izkIr djus gsrq Dyse ;kfpdk izLrqr dh x;h FkhA fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk mDr Dyse ;kfpdk esa ;kph dks dqy 13]89]749@& #i;s dh {kfriwfrZ jkf'k e; C;kt 06 izfr'kr lkykuk dh nj ls fnyokbZ x;h gSA mDr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ls O;fFkr gksdj gLrxr vihy] vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus grs q izLrqr dh x;h gSA
3- nkSjkus cgl fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk rdZ jgk gS fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZ dh ekfld vk; 7]560@& #i;s fu/kkZfjr dh tkdj =qfV dkfjr dh x;h gS] tcfd oDr ?kVuk vihykFkhZ jsfMesM xkjesUVl dk O;olk; dj 20]000@& #i;s izfrekg vk; vftZr djrk FkkA nq?kZVuk esa vihykFkhZ ds iSj esa vfLHkHkax o vU; xaHkhj pksVsa dkfjr gqbZ gS] ftuds lkewfgd izHkko ls mlds 'kjhj ij dqy 70-13 izfr'kr LFkk;h fu;ksZX;rk vkuk ik;k x;k gS] ftls fo}ku vf/kdj.k us dsoy 50 izfr'kr ekuk tkdj =qfV dkfjr dh gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh lq[k&lqfo/kk dh deh ds en esa dksbZ jkf'k ugha fnyokbZ xbZ gS rFkk 'kkjhfjd o ekufld ihMk+ dh en esa o vU; enksa esa Hkh vR;f/kd de jkf'k fnyokbZ x;h gS] ftuesa c<+ksrjh dh tkosA vr% vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy Lohdkj dh tkdj {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;hA
4- blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ chek dEiuh dh vksj ls mijksDr rdkZsa dk fojks/k djrs gq, fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds fu.kZ; dh iqf"V fd;s tkus rFkk vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls lafLFkr dh x;h vihy dks [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;hA
5- nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh x;hA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA
6- eksVj nq?kZVuk esa vkgr O;fDr;ksa dks {kfriwfrZ fnyok;s tkus ds lna HkZ esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk vius U;kf;d n`"Vkar Anant Son of Sidheswar Dukre Vs. Pratap son of Zhampannappa Lamzane & Anr. reported in (2018) 9 Supreme Court Cases
450, esa fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS tks fuEu izdkj ls gS %&
“12. In case of motor accidents leading to injuries and disablements, it is a well settled principle that a person must not only be compensated for his physical injury, but also for the non-pecuniary losses which he has suffered due to the injury. The claimant is entitled to be compensated for his inability to lead a full life, and enjoy those things and amenities which he would have enjoyed, but for the injuries."
"13. The purpose of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act is to fully and adequately restore the aggrieved to t