[2026:RJ-JD:7618]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14211/2025 Chinder Kaur W/o Gursewak Singh, Aged About 50 Years, R/o 5 MD-A Tehsil Ghadsana District Sri Ganganagar. (Presently Lodged At Dist. Jail Sriganganagar)

----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P.K. Rawla for Mr. Devilal Rawla For Respondent(s) : Mr. Urja Ram, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

Order

11/02/2026

1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.410/2024 registered at Police Station Nai Mandi Gharsana, District Sri Ganganagar for offence under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of BNS.

2. In the present matter the petitioner is charged for the murder of her husband.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that as per the material available on record and evidence collected during investigation, CCTV footage of the alleged incident clearly establishes role of the petitioner reflecting that the petitioner has no active involvement in the charged offence. He argued that as per the CCTV footage, it was the deceased who started fighting with the present petitioner and thereafter, petitioner left her house around 04:00 PM and around 04:36 PM son of the deceased Jagga Singh entered into the house and started beating the deceased Gursewak Singh with a wooden stick which might be the cause of death of the deceased. Hence, the entire CCTV footage reveals that petitioner has no active role in the commission of the offence rather she was the aggrieved party with the ill treatment of the deceased. It is contended by learned counsel that the petitioner is behind the bars since 18.09.2024 and out of 17 witnesses, statements of only 5 witnesses have been recorded so far, charge- sheet has been filed, the trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially in the light of analysis of CCTV footage, but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Chinder Kaur W/o Gursewak Singh, be released on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that she shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J BMG/Parshant/39