SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 3767

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
SANJEET PUROHIT
CLG SHIKSHAN SANTHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW / 492 / 2026



[2026:RJ-JD:7743]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 492/2026 Clg Shikshan Santhan, Jodhpur Through Its President Dr. Chaganlal Gehlot, Son Of Shri Gena Ram Aged About 53 Years, Resident Of E-44/45 Kalpatru Shopping Centre, Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur, (Rajasthan).

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Department Of Medical And Health (Group Iii), Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

2. Rajasthan Nursing Council, Through Its Registrar, B-39, Sardar Patel Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

3. Rajasthan University Of Health And Science, Through Its Registrar, Kumbha Marg, Partap Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

4. Private Physiotherapy, Nursing And Para Medical Institutions Society, Branch Office Jodhpur. Through Its Secretary, Plot No. 273, Subhash Nagar, Pal Road, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajender Katariya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhavyadeep Singh for Mr. Vinay Kothari HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT

Order

11/02/2026

1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:-

“i. The Respondent No.3 may be directed to issue affiliation to the Petitioner Institute to conduct B.Sc. (N)course for the academic session

2025-26 for 30 seats;

ii. The Petitioner Institute may be permitted to under take the B.Sc. (N) Course for the academic session 2025-

26.

iii. That the Respondent no. 4 (Private Federation) may be directed to allot students to the Petitioner's Institute on vacant seats;

iv. Any other appropriate relief which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the Petitioner.”

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the NOC has been granted to the petitioner-institution. He further submits that in view of the subsequent developments the present writ petition may be disposed of.

3. At this stage, learned counsel for the respondents submit that respondents have issued the NOC after the last date of affiliation, however, submit that petitioner would be liable for payment of the affiliation fee, including late fee and penalty, if any, and the petitioner would be required to adhere with the guidelines of RUHS/RNC and other authorities while seeking affiliation/recognition.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respondents.

5. In view of the submissions made above, the present writ petition is disposed of while directing the respondent -RUHS to permit the petitioner to participate in the counseling for B.Sc. (N)Session 2025-26, if any, and proceed with the affiliation to the petitioner with further conditions that the petitioner would be liable for payment of the affiliation fee, including late fee and penalty, if any, and the petitioner would be required to adhere with the guidelines of RUHS/RNC and other authorities while seeking affiliation/recognition.

6. All other pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(SANJEET PUROHIT),J

32-yagya/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top