SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 3796

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ANUROOP SINGHI
SUNIL KUMAR SON OF SHREE RAMCHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW / 2210 / 2026



[2026:RJ-JP:6403]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2210/2026 Sunil Kumar Son Of Shree Ramchandra, Resident Of Village Sirod Khurd, Tehasil- Mundawar District Alwar, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretory, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur

2. District Collector, Khairthal-Tijara

3. Tehsildar, Mundawar, District-Khairthal-Tijara, Rajasthan.

4. Raj Singh, Son Of Shree Surajbhan

5. Mukesh, Son Of Shreeram

6. Kanwar Singh, Son Of Natthu Ram

7. Sajjan Singh, Son Of Patram

8. Dharmpal, Son Of Sukhram

9. Raisingh, Son Of Sukhram

10. Surendra Son Of Surajbhan, All Residents Of Sirod Khaurd, Teh Mundawar, District Khairthal- Tijara, Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vivek Gaur For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Chaudhary for Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI

Order

11/02/2026

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-

"In view of above mentioned facts and circumstances the petitioner most humbly pray that your lordship may graciously be pleased to accept this writ petition and be further pleased to direct the respondent no 1 to 3 to remove the encroachment and illegal construction made by the respondent no 4 to 10 on the land bearing Khasara no 759 (712) and 929 which are charagah land situated at village Sirod Khurd, Tehasil Mundawar dist Khairthal- Tijara, Raj, and also direct them to take appropriate action against the respondent no 4 to 10.

Any other order or direction may be issued in the facts and circumstances of the case as your Lordships may deem just and proper.”

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the present matter, the petitioner has submitted a representation before the Tehsildar, Mundawar, Khairtal Tijara, however, no heed was paid to the said representation by the Tehsildar, Mundawar, Khairtal Tijara.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the present writ petition be disposed of in light of the order dated 30.01.2019 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.10819/2018] with liberty to the petitioner to file representation(s) before the Public Land Protection Cell (hereinafter referred to as ‘PLPC’) constituted in compliance of the order passed in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena (supra)

4. In that view of the matter, the present writ petition stands disposed of in light of the order passed in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena (supra) with a direction to the petitioner to file representation(s) before the PLPC. It is further directed that the PLPC shall decide the representation(s), if any, filed by the petitioner, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order.

5. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

6. Needless to say, this order has been passed only to decide the petitioner’s representation and in no manner is to be construed as a direction to decide the said representation in a particular manner.

(ANUROOP SINGHI),J DIPESH CHAYAL /16

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top