##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JP:4052]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

15909/2025

Pradhan S/o Kalyan, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Kolaspura, Police

Station Indergarh, District Bundi (Raj.) (At Present Confined In

District Jail Bundi).

----Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

Connected With

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

15910/2025

Rajendra S/o Kalyan, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Kolaspura, Police

Station Indergarh, District Bundi (Raj.) (At Present Confined In

District Jail Bundi).

----Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

15911/2025

Mahendra @ Forulal S/o Kalyan, R/o Gram Kolaspura, Police

Station Indergarh District Bundi (Raj.) (At Present Confined In

District Jail Bundi)

----Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikash Kumar Jakhar

Mr. Devendra Choudhary

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P.

Mr. Mahaveer Prasad, ASI, Police

Station Indergarh District Bundi

(Uploaded on 31/01/2026 at 04:16:40 PM)

(Downloaded on 15/02/2026 at 06:14:01 AM)

[2026:RJ-JP:4052] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15909/2025]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Order

29/01/2026

1. These bail applications have been filed under Section

483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioners in connection

with FIR No. 115/2025 registered at Police Station Indergarh,

District Bundi for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2),

110, 189(2) of B.N.S. 2023.

2. Heard.

3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the

accused-petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also

perused the case diary.

4. As per the contents of the First Information Report all

the three accused persons gave blows on the persons of the

members of the complainant party and in the said incident four

persons sustained injuries.

5. As per the medico legal report, Radiologist's

Report and opinion of the medical jurists the injured Bherulal is

said to have received three injuries by sharp edged weapon and

one of the injury has been opined to be dangerous to life. As per

averments made in the F.I.R. the injury which has been opined to

be dangerous to life has been attributed to the accused-petitioner

Rajendra.

Injured Manoj @ Vinod is said to have sustained two

injuries and as per Radiologist's Report, injury No. 1 was found to

be grievous in nature and later on it has been found to be

(Uploaded on 31/01/2026 at 04:16:40 PM)

(Downloaded on 15/02/2026 at 06:14:01 AM)

[2026:RJ-JP:4052] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15909/2025]

dangerous to life. The said injury has been attributed to accused

Pradhan.

Injured Raju has also sustained two injuries out of

which one of the injury has been opined to be grievous in nature

and another injured Kali Bai has also sustained one injury.

6. Taking into consideration the allegations against the

accused-petitioners and so also the injuries sustained by the

complainant party and the nature of the injuries, this Court is not

inclined to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.

7. Accordingly, these bail applications are dismissed.

8. However, accused-petitioners shall be at liberty to file fresh

bail applications after statements of the injured witnesses.

(GANESH RAM MEENA,J

SHRUTI SHARMA /55,56,57

(Uploaded on 31/01/2026 at 04:16:40 PM)

(Downloaded on 15/02/2026 at 06:14:01 AM)