HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
JAHID S/O MAMMALDIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 1687 / 2026
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JP:4092]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1687/2026
Jahid S/o Mammaldin, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Jhenjhpuri,
Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shiv Kumar
Mr. Sabir Ali
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order
29/01/2026
1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.45/2025
registered at Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg for the
offences under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338,
336(3), 340(2), 308(2) and 61(2) of BNS and Sections 66-D, 66-
E and 67-a of I.T. Act, the accused-petitioner has preferred this
criminal misc. bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the
accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is
contended that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate. The
accused-petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the
investigation and there are no criminal antecedents against the
accused-petitioner, therefore, anticipatory bail application of the
accused-petitioner may be allowed.
(Uploaded on 31/01/2026 at 02:39:48 PM)
(Downloaded on 15/02/2026 at 06:25:39 AM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JP:4092] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1687/2026]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant
of anticipatory bail application.
4. Heard and perused the material available on the record.
5. Considering the fact that the offences alleged against the
petitioner is exclusively triable by Magistrate, the accused-
petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation
and there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-
petitioner, without commenting anything on the merits of the case,
I deem it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application
of the accused-petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application under Section
482 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of
arrest of the accused-petitioner namely Jahid S/o Mammaldin,
in connection with FIR No.45/2025 registered at Police Station
Kaithwara, District Deeg, he shall be released on bail, provided
furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two
sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the
S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the
following conditions:-
(i) that the petitioner shall make himself
available for interrogation by a police officer as and
when required;
(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or
indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise
to any person acquainted with the facts of the case
so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts
to the court or any police officer, and
(iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India
without previous permission of the court.
(iv) that the petitioner would submit his Mobile
phones and Sim Cards before the concerned
Investigating Officer.
(v) that the accused-petitioner would submit his
contact details along with the present address to
(Uploaded on 31/01/2026 at 02:39:48 PM)
(Downloaded on 15/02/2026 at 06:25:39 AM)
##PAGE3##[2026:RJ-JP:4092] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1687/2026]
the concerned Investigating Officer. In case if the
petitioner changes his address or mobile number,
he shall submit the same before the concerned
Investigating Officer.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J
ANAND/RASHMI/12
(Uploaded on 31/01/2026 at 02:39:48 PM)
(Downloaded on 15/02/2026 at 06:25:39 AM)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.