HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
BIPIN GUPTA
DR. CHETAN SHUKLA S/O SHRI SUSHIL KUMAR SHUKLA – Appellant
Versus
SMT. SUDARSHAN SHARMA W/O LATE SHRI VINOD KUMAR SHARMA – Respondent
CW / 575 / 2024
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JP:4156]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 575/2024
Dr. Chetan Shukla, S/o Shri Sushil Kumar Shukla, Aged About 62
Years, R/o House No. 149, Gali No. 1, Janakpuri Mala Road, Kota
(Rajasthan) 324002.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Smt. Sudarshan Sharma W/o Late Shri Vinod Kumar
Sharma, R/o 1431-A, R.k. Puram, Kota. Successor, Late
Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma S/o Late Shri Moolchand Ji
Sharma.
2. Ms. Abhishansha Sharma D/o Late Shri Vinod Kumar
Sharma, R/o 1431-A, R.k. Puram, Kota. Successor Late
Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma S/o Late Shri Moolchand Ji
Sharma.
3. Shri Alankar Sharma S/o Late Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma,
R/o 1431-A, R.k. Puram, Kota. Successor Late Shri Vinod
Kumar Sharma S/o Late Shri Moolchand Ji Sharma.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Brij Bhushan Ojha with
Mr. Devanshu Agrawal.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashwani Chobisa with
Mr. Veerendra Singh
Mr. Priyank Dixit.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
Order
29/01/2026
1. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order
dated 21.12.2023, passed by learned District Judge, Kota, in Civil
Suit No. 119/2019, whereby, the application filed by the plaintiff-
petitioner under Order 7 Rule 14 CPC has been rejected.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that a suit for
recovery of an amount of Rs.16,10,000/-, which was paid as loan
to the defendant-respondent was filed before the learned Civil
Court. During the pendency of the suit, plaintiff filed an application
under Order 11 Rule 12 and 14 CPC for discovery of the bank
(Uploaded on 06/02/2026 at 05:10:31 PM)
(Downloaded on 15/02/2026 at 06:52:28 AM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JP:4156] (2 of 3) [CW-575/2024]
statement of the defendant’s Bank in which the amount was paid.
However, he submits that the said application was rejected by the
learned trial Court vide order dated 26.07.2023, holding that the
plaintiff can produce his statement of account to show the factum
of payment to the defendant.
3. It is further contended by learned counsel for the petitioner
that thereafter, he obtained the statement of account from his
Bank, which was submitted along with the application filed under
Order 7 Rule 14 CPC before the learned trial Court, which has
been wrongly rejected. He further prays that the documents are
very necessary and relevant for adjudication of the suit.
4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent-defendant
opposes the prayer and contends that the said documents have
been filed at the stage of final hearing of the suit and therefore,
there were no bonafides of the plaintiff to not produce the
documents along with plaint. He thus, supports the order dated
21.12.2023.
5. Heard both the parties and perused the material available on
record.
6. This Court finds that the document are the statement of
Bank which cannot be doubted. Even otherwise the case of the
plaintiff is that by way of certain cheques he has transferred the
amount in the account of the defendant and to show that transfer
he had submitted these statement of accounts. If the defendant
has not received any such amount then there is always right
available with the defendant to disprove this fact by placing his
statement on account before the learned trial Court. This Court is
(Uploaded on 06/02/2026 at 05:10:31 PM)
(Downloaded on 15/02/2026 at 06:52:28 AM)
##PAGE3##[2026:RJ-JP:4156] (3 of 3) [CW-575/2024]
of the opinion that the documents at this stage ought not to have
been declined by the learned trial Court.
7. Considering the same, the order dated 26.07.2023 is hereby
quashed and set aside and the documents are permitted to taken
on record, subject to payment of Rs.20,000/- to the defendant-
respondent. It is further made clear that the defendant-
respondent will be entitled to place the evidence in rebuttal, if the
plaintiff produces any evidence in support of these documents.
8. With the above observation, the present writ petition stands
disposed of.
9. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(BIPIN GUPTA),J
Jubin /40
(Uploaded on 06/02/2026 a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.