SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 3967

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MANEESH SHARMA
MODERN EMERGENCY SERVICES JV PVT. LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW / 19810 / 2025



##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JP:4142]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19810/2025

Modern Emergency Services JV Pvt. Limited, Having Its

Registered Office At 407, 4Th Floor, Jaipur Center, B2 By Pass

Junction, Tonk Road Jaipur Through Authorized Representative

Shri Shrikant Taneja, S/o Sudhir Kumar Taneja, Aged About 34

Years, R/o 312 Surya City, Bharatpur, Rajasthan

----Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary,

Department Of Medical Health And Family Welfare

Government Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. Mission Director, National Health Mission, Rajasthan,

Swasthya Bhawan, C-Scheme, Jaipur.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Madav Mitra, Sr. Adv. assisted by

Mr. Sanjay Sharma,

Mr. Vibhuti Bhushan Sharma,

Ms. Jaya Mitra &

Mr. Sharukh Khan

Mr. Vibhuti Bhushan Sharma

Mr. Harshit Tiwari

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC with

Mr. Rahul Verma &

Mr. Prakhar Jain

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA

Order

29/01/2026

1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following

prayers -

"It is therefore, humbly prayed before Your Lordships that your

Lordships after going through the entire record of the case may

very graciously allow the instant Writ Petition and further:

(i) By appropriate writ, order or direction, Your

Lordships may kindly be pleased to quash and set aside the

impugned order dated 10.12.2025 (Annexure-1) passed by

Respondent No. 2 herein; and

(ii) By appropriate writ, order or direction, Your

Lordships may kindly be pleased to direct the Respondents to

give extension of the contract/agreement dated 11.12.2020 in

favour of the petitioner for a further period of six months; and

(iii) By appropriate writ, order or direction, Your

Lordships may kindly be pleased to strike down Condition No.

6.4(35) contained in the Request for Proposal dated

26.11.2025 (Annexure-18); and

(iv) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, Your

Lordships may kindly be pleased to direct the Respondents to

reimburse the cost of newly procured 350 vehicles/ambulances

(Uploaded on 03/02/2026 at 10:52:45 AM)

(Downloaded on 15/02/2026 at 07:05:29 AM)

##PAGE2##

[2026:RJ-JP:4142] (2 of 9) [CW-19810/2025]

strictly in accordance with the letter dated 11.07.2023

(Annexure-16) and/or

(v) Any other order or direction as Your Lordships

deem just, appropriate and equitable in the facts and

circumstances of the case may also kindly be passed in favor of

the petitioner."

2. Brief facts giving rise to the present writ petition are that the

petitioner is a Joint-Venture Company comprising of M/s Gunesh

India Private Limited, M/s Sammaan Foundation and M/s Golden

Path Lab Private Limited. All the aforementioned three companies

are duly incorporated under the Indian Companies Act and decided

to form a Joint Venture by executing a Joint Venture Agreement

on 01.09.2020. The respondent issued a Request for Proposal

('RFP') on 07.07.2020 for the operation and management of 104

Janani Express in the State of Rajasthan as per the terms and

conditions contained therein and the petitioner participated and

succeeded in obtaining a Letter of Intent ('LOI') on 17.11.2020.

3. Pursuant to the LOI dated 17.11.2020, the petitioner signed

a service agreement dated 11.12.2020. The duration of the

service agreement was initially from 10.12.2020 to 10.12.2023,

which was extended vide order dated 24.08.2023 for a further

period of two years up to 10.12.2025, which came to an end on

10.12.2025.

4. From the averments of the writ petition, it is borne out that

in the present writ petition, the petitioner is assailing: the legality

and validity of the order dated 10.12.2025 passed by respondent

No.2, wherein respondent No.2 rejected the petitioner's request to

extend the period of the service agreement dated 11.12.2020 for

a further period of six months; reimburse the cost of newly

procured 350 vehicles/ambulances; as well as Clause 6.4(35) of

(Uploaded on 03/02/2026 at 10:52:45 AM)

(Downloaded on 15/02/2026 at 07:05:29 AM)

##PAGE3##

[2026:RJ-JP:4142] (3 of 9) [CW-19810/2025]

the subsequent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top