2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 4003
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
SAMEER JAIN
RAHUL KUMAR S/O SHRI RAMAVATAR SONI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 603 / 2026
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JP:3908]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 603/2026
Rahul Kumar S/o Shri Ramavatar Soni, Aged About 33 Years, R/o
Ward Number 09, Darjiyon Ka Mohalla, Badhayas, Thana Renwal,
District Jaipur Rural. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Sambhar
Lake).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Adarsh Singhal
For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP with
Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP
Ms. Naresh Kanwar Rathore, CI
Mr. Prahlad Singh, ASI
Mr. Shrawan Kumar, CI (Cyber Cell
Officer)
Mr. Sita Ram, Constable
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
28/01/2026
1. The instant second bail application has been filed under
Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-
applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 312/2025
registered at Police Station Renwal District Jaipur Rural for the
offence(s) under Sections 316(2), 318(4) of BNS.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that
the applicant is a young man aged 33 years. It is submitted that
applicant is in custody ever since 16.09.2025. It is further
submitted that applicant is alleged of Cyber Crime and complaint
is filed by the police authorities not by any private person. It is
also submitted that charge-sheet has been filed. Learned counsel
further submits that the conclusion of trial is likely to take a long
(Uploaded on 31/01/2026 at 01:03:25 PM)
(Downloaded on 15/02/2026 at 07:59:08 AM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JP:3908] (2 of 5) [CRLMB-603/2026]
time and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the
applicant behind bars till disposal of the case.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently
opposed the bail application. Investigating Officer has marked
presence in the Court and has submitted that there is 17
complaint registered against the accused-applicant on National
Cyber Crime Reporting Portal.
4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned
counsel for the parties and considering the fact that accused-
applicant is a young man aged 33 years; that accused-applicant is
in custody ever since 16.09.2025; that charge-sheet has been
filed and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case
and material on record but without commenting on
merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail
application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail.
5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS
is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Rahul Kumar
S/o Shri Ramavatar Soni shall be enlarged on bail provided he
furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of
Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his
appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing
as and when called upon to do so.
6. Taking note of the subject matter and place reliance
upon the ratio and directions spelled out in SBCRLMB No.
9343/2025 titled as Mohit Vs. State of Raj. this Court is of the
view that in addition to the condition as imposed, the following
conditions are also to be abided by the applicant. For the sake of
(Uploaded on 31/01/2026 at 01:03:25 PM)
(Downloaded on 15/02/2026 at 07:59:08 AM)
##PAGE3##[2026:RJ-JP:3908] (3 of 5) [CRLMB-603/2026]
convenience the conditions imposed upon the applicants are
reproduced herein below:-
"a. Banking Restrictions:
i) The financial transactions of the accused-applicant
shall remain confined to one designated bank account,
details of which shall be furnished to the Investigating
Officer (I.O.) and the learned Trial Court, prior to
release on bail. Moreover, if multiple accounts are
operative in any Bank, under the name of the accused-
applicant(s)/convicted person, the same shall be
closed with immediate effect i.e. prior to release of the
applicant(s).
ii) The monthly bank statement of the said account
shall be submitted regularly to both the I.O. and the
Trial Court during the pendency of the trial.
iii) The Reserve Bank of India may also be directed to
issue