SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 4003

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
SAMEER JAIN
RAHUL KUMAR S/O SHRI RAMAVATAR SONI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 603 / 2026



##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JP:3908]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 603/2026

Rahul Kumar S/o Shri Ramavatar Soni, Aged About 33 Years, R/o

Ward Number 09, Darjiyon Ka Mohalla, Badhayas, Thana Renwal,

District Jaipur Rural. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Sambhar

Lake).

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Adarsh Singhal

For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP with

Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP

Ms. Naresh Kanwar Rathore, CI

Mr. Prahlad Singh, ASI

Mr. Shrawan Kumar, CI (Cyber Cell

Officer)

Mr. Sita Ram, Constable

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

Order

28/01/2026

1. The instant second bail application has been filed under

Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-

applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 312/2025

registered at Police Station Renwal District Jaipur Rural for the

offence(s) under Sections 316(2), 318(4) of BNS.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that

the applicant is a young man aged 33 years. It is submitted that

applicant is in custody ever since 16.09.2025. It is further

submitted that applicant is alleged of Cyber Crime and complaint

is filed by the police authorities not by any private person. It is

also submitted that charge-sheet has been filed. Learned counsel

further submits that the conclusion of trial is likely to take a long

(Uploaded on 31/01/2026 at 01:03:25 PM)

(Downloaded on 15/02/2026 at 07:59:08 AM)

##PAGE2##

[2026:RJ-JP:3908] (2 of 5) [CRLMB-603/2026]

time and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the

applicant behind bars till disposal of the case.

3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently

opposed the bail application. Investigating Officer has marked

presence in the Court and has submitted that there is 17

complaint registered against the accused-applicant on National

Cyber Crime Reporting Portal.

4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned

counsel for the parties and considering the fact that accused-

applicant is a young man aged 33 years; that accused-applicant is

in custody ever since 16.09.2025; that charge-sheet has been

filed and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case

and material on record but without commenting on

merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail

application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail.

5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS

is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Rahul Kumar

S/o Shri Ramavatar Soni shall be enlarged on bail provided he

furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of

Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his

appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing

as and when called upon to do so.

6. Taking note of the subject matter and place reliance

upon the ratio and directions spelled out in SBCRLMB No.

9343/2025 titled as Mohit Vs. State of Raj. this Court is of the

view that in addition to the condition as imposed, the following

conditions are also to be abided by the applicant. For the sake of

(Uploaded on 31/01/2026 at 01:03:25 PM)

(Downloaded on 15/02/2026 at 07:59:08 AM)

##PAGE3##

[2026:RJ-JP:3908] (3 of 5) [CRLMB-603/2026]

convenience the conditions imposed upon the applicants are

reproduced herein below:-

"a. Banking Restrictions:

i) The financial transactions of the accused-applicant

shall remain confined to one designated bank account,

details of which shall be furnished to the Investigating

Officer (I.O.) and the learned Trial Court, prior to

release on bail. Moreover, if multiple accounts are

operative in any Bank, under the name of the accused-

applicant(s)/convicted person, the same shall be

closed with immediate effect i.e. prior to release of the

applicant(s).

ii) The monthly bank statement of the said account

shall be submitted regularly to both the I.O. and the

Trial Court during the pendency of the trial.

iii) The Reserve Bank of India may also be directed to

issue

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top