HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
GANESH RAM MEENA
MUJAHID @ AASHU S/O SHRI ABDUL WAHID – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 1575 / 2026
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JP:3765]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
1575/2026
Mujahid @ Aashu S/o Shri Abdul Wahid, Aged About 29 Years,
R/o House No. B-124, Hajrat Ali Colony, Ramgarh Mod, Karbala,
Police Station Brahmpuri, Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In
Central Jail, Jaipur).
----Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Gurjar
For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
28/01/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483
of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of
accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No. 18/2026 registered
at Police Station Jaisinghpura Khor, District Jaipur City (North) for
offence under Sections 8, 21 of the N.D.P.S. Act 1985 and 111(2)
(b) of B.N.S. Act 2023.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-
petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel
further submits that as per the F.I.R., the allegation levelled
against the present accused-petitioner is that 7.50 gram smack
has been recovered from his possession, which is less than
commercial quantity. He further submits that the accused-
petitioner is in custody since 12.01.2026 and trial of the case is
(Uploaded on 31/01/2026 at 04:04:32 PM)
(Downloaded on 15/02/2026 at 08:03:10 AM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JP:3765] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1575/2026]
likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, the
accused-petitioner may be released on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail
application and submits that there is a recovery of 7.50 gram
smack from the possession of the accused-petitioner, therefore, he
does not deserve indulgence of bail by this Court.
4. Considered the submissions made at bar and also perused
the material made available on record.
5. The allegation against the petitioner relates to commission of
offence under the provisions of Section 8 & 21 of the Narcotic
Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and the alleged
recovery from him is of 7.50 gram smack, which is stipulated to
be less than commercial quantity. The restriction for grant of bail
under the provisions of Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act does not
apply in the present case.
6. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Puranmal Jat Vs.
State of Rajasthan in Criminal Appeal No.3394/2023 arising
out of SLP (Crl.) No.10670/2023 decided on 02.11.2023 has
enlarged the accused therein on bail and observed as under:-
“The allegations against the appellant relate to
commission of offence under the provisions of
Sections 8 and 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and
Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter
called “the Act”). Alleged recovery from him is about
35 kgs. and 150 grams Doda Posh (Poppy straw).
The commercial quantity for poppy straw is 50 kgs.
The appellant is in custody for over seven months.
Charge-sheet has been submitted in the case. The
(Uploaded on 31/01/2026 at 04:04:32 PM)
(Downloaded on 15/02/2026 at 08:03:10 AM)
##PAGE3##[2026:RJ-JP:3765] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1575/2026]
recovered contraband item having weight less than
the stipulated commercial quantity, the restriction
on grant of bail under Section 37 of the Act does not
apply in his case. We do not think his continued
detention pending trial is necessary in the given
circumstances.”
7. Having regard to the submissions made above, this Court
without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the
case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on
bail.
8. Accordingly, the present bail application is allowed and it is
directed that the accused-petitioner shall be released on bail
provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of
Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lax Only) together with two sureties
in the sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to
the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that
he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter
is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.