2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 4016
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ANAND SHARMA
DR PANKAJ BANSAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE MEDICALAND AND HEALTHORS – Respondent
CW / 9136 / 2013
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JP:4595]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9136/2013
Dr. Pankaj Bansal aged about 25 years Son Of Shri Chaman Lal
Bansal, R/o Shop No. 29, Radhey Krishna Art Gallery, Peer Baba
Road, Baltana District SAS Nagar (Punjab).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary, Medical
And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan,
Secretariat, Jaipur
2. Director (Public Health), Medical And Health Services,
Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur
3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Barmer
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Adv.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC with
Mr. Devraj Saini, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order
28/01/2026
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with
following prayers:-
“It is, therefore, prayed that the Hon’ble Court may
call for the entire record concerning the case and by
issuing writ, order or direction or in the nature
thereof;
(i) the period of joining as Medical Officer (Dental)
of the petitioner be extended till he completes his
PG studies i.e. upto June 2015 and the earlier
joining submitted by the petitioner on
06/07.05.2013 be treated as nonest; with all
consequential benefits;
(ii) if during the pendency of writ petition, the
appointment granted to the petitioner on the post
of Medical Officer (Dental) is cancelled, the same be
(Uploaded on 03/02/2026 at 05:28:01 PM)
(Downloaded on 15/02/2026 at 08:09:57 AM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JP:4595] (2 of 3) [CW-9136/2013]
also considered and quashed, with all consequential
benefits to the petitioner;
(iii) any other order or direction as may be deemed
fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the
case may also be passed in favour of humble
petitioner.
(iv) cost of this writ petition may also be awarded
in favour of humble petitioner.”
2. Both learned counsel for the parties are in agreement
that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is
squarely covered by the order dated 07.09.2016 passed in a batch
of writ petitions led by S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10669/2013 (Dr.
Rekha Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.), in which
following directions were given:-
“Taking into consideration the facts and the Rules
referred to above, I am of the opinion that the
respondents should have considered case of the
petitioners for grant of study leave as their
admission in PG course was after entering into
service. The embargo to complete three years
service before seeking study leave would not apply
to the petitioners being probationers thus cannot
be considered to be temporary employees.
Accordingly, these writ petitions are allowed.
The respondents are directed to grant study leave
as per Rules 110 and 122 of the Rules for a period
of 36 months, i.e., the period of PG Course. On
completion of the course, petitioners be allowed to
join the post. The petitioners would, however,
furnish an undertaking along with a bond of Rs.10
lac each to the effect that after completion of PG
course they will serve the government for a
minimum period of five years.”
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during
the pendency of writ petition, petitioner has already completed his
studies in post graduate degree in dental and thereafter, he has
been regularly discharging duties in respondent-department. This
(Uploaded on 03/02/2026 at 05:28:01 PM)
(Downloaded on 15/02/2026 at 08:09:57 AM)
##PAGE3##[2026:RJ-JP:4595] (3 of 3) [CW-9136/2013]
fact has not been disputed by learned counsel for the
respondents.
4. In the light of above, where the controversy is no
longer res-integra, the writ petition is disposed of in the light of
above order dated 07.09.2016 passed in the case of Dr. Rekha
Meena (Supra) and it is further directed that the petitioner shall
be entitled for benefit of study leave as prayed by him and the
higher qualification acquired by him shall also be entered into in
his service record by the respondents, which shall be taken into
consideration for all the service benefits.
5. The writ pet