[2026:RJ-JP:3117]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

7912/2025 Banti S/o Brajsundar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Adeela, Police Station Kapren, District Bundi (Raj.)

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ramniwas Meena For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Order

23/01/2026

1. The petitioner has filed this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.80/2025 registered with the Police Station Kapren, District Bundi for offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 110 & 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated in a case based on false and fabricated story. Learned counsel further submits that in a case lodged by the present petitioner-party against the present complainant-party, the Police after completion of investigation has submitted charge- sheet against the complainant-party and so as to create pressure of compromise in that matter, the complainant party has lodged this criminal case against the petitioner. Learned counsel also submits that all the injuries said to have been sustained by the complainant party, are simple in nature and no purpose will be served in sending the petitioner in custody and the co-accused namely Brajsundar S/o Jagannath and Mastram S/o Latoorlal have already extended the benefit of anticipatory bail. Therefore, the petitioner may be given the benefit of anticipatory bail.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

4. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor.

5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that all the injuries said to have been sustained by the complainant party in the alleged incident, are simple in nature and also the fact that the co-accuseds have already extended the benefit of anticipatory bail, this Court deems just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. The Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Kapren, District Bundi in F.I.R. No. 80/2025 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused- petitioner he shall be released on bail, provided of him furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to his satisfaction on the following conditions:-

(I). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer, and (iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court.

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /1