[2026:RJ-JP:5796]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3125/2022

1- txnh'k cSjok iq= Jh xaxk/kkj cSjok] mez 34 o"kZ] fuoklh iDdk /kksjk] iqfyl Fkkuk e.Mkojh] rglhy ykylksV] ftyk nkSlk] gky fuoklh ekQZr dkyh nsoh iRuh Jh xksiky cSjok] Mksfj;k dkWyksuh] x.ks'kiqjk jksM+] nkSlk& tfj;s okn U;k; fe= iRuh Jherh larjk iRuh Jh txnh'k cSjok]

fuoklh mijksDrA &&&izkFkhZ@vihykFkhZ Versus ,l- dUuu iq= Jh lueqxh;k] fuoklh dfjudwYye fMohtu

1.

ckxeksu] LVsV okxkeksj] ih-vks- :Mdh] ftyk dsjykA ¼okgu pkyd Vªd la[;k Vh,u&33&,ih&3114½

2. L.S. Palanisamy S/o Sh. P. Sengoda Gounder, R/o Door No.1/117, East Streek, Lakkapuram, Erode-2 Modakurichi Talukl, Erode District, Tamil Nadu.

okgu ekfyd o chek/kkjh Vªd la[;k Vh,u&33&,ih&3114 ( )

3. R. Muthusamy S/o Sh. Rangasay, R/o Kamarajar Taluk, Erode Districtk, Tamilnadu.

okgu eq[R;kj Lokeh Vªd la[;k Vh,u&33&,ih&3114 ( )

fn U;w bf.M;k ,';ksjsal daiuh fyfeVsM tfj;s {ksf=, izcU/k {ks=h;

4.

dk;kZy; ykylksV jksM+] nkSlk-

chek daiuh pkyd Vªd la[;k Vh,u&33&,ih&3114 ( )

&&&vizkFkhZx.k For Appellant(s) : Mr. Bhanu Prakash Verma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singhal, Adv.

(For Insurance Company)

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

Judgment

21/01/2026

1- vihykFkhZ txnh'k cSjok }kjk ;g vihy /kkjk 173 eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e&1988 ds rgr U;k;ky; eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k ¼ikfjokfjd U;k;ky;½] nkSlk ¼ftls vkxs ^fo}ku vf/kdj.k* ds uke ls lca ksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ }kjk Dyse ;kfpdk la[;k&16@2018 ¼382@2017½] txnh'k cSjok cuke ,l- dUuu o vU; esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 28-07-2022 ds fo#)

izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

2- vihykFkhZ txnh'k cSjok }kjk fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds le{k] Lo;a ds eksVj okgu nq?kZVuk esa vkgr gks tkus ds QyLo:i dqy 55]50]000@& #i;s Dyse izkIr djus grs q Dyse ;kfpdk izLrqr dh x;h FkhA fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk mDr Dyse ;kfpdk esa vihykFkhZ dks dqy 2]77]969@& #i;s dh {kfriwfrZ jkf’k e; C;kt 7 izfr’kr lkykuk dh nj ls fnyokbZ x;h gSA fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds mDr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ls O;fFkr gksdj gLrxr vihy] vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus grs q izLrqr dh x;h gSA

3- nkSjkus cgl fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk rdZ jgk fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk oDr ?kVuk vihykFkhZ dh ekfld vk; 5]382@& :Ik;s ¼26 fnuksa ds vk/kkj ij½ fu/kkZfjr dh tkdj =qfV dkfjr dh gS] tcfd vihykFkhZ oDr ?kVuk VªkaliksVZ dk dk;Z dj 15]000@& ls 30]000@& :i;s ekfld vk; vftZr djrk FkkA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZ dks Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh vk; o`f) ckcr dksbZ {kfriwfrZ jkf'k ugha fnyokbZ xbZ gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk 'kkjhfjd o ekufld ihMk+ dh en esa rFkk Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh lq[k&lqfo/kk dh deh ds en esa Hkh leqfpr jkf'k ugha fnyokbZ gS rFkk vU; enksa esa Hkh vR;f/kd de jkf'k fnyokbZ x;h gS] ftuesa c<+ksrjh dh tkosA vr% vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy Lohdkj dh tkdj {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;hA

4- blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ chek dEiuh dh vksj ls vihykFkhZ ds mijksDr rdksZa dk fojks/k djrs gq, fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk ikfjr fd;s x;s fu.kZ; dh iqf"V fd;s tkus rFkk vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls lfa LFkr dh x;h vihy dks fujLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

5- nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh x;hA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

6- gLrxr ekeys dh nq?kZVuk esa vihykFkhZ dks dkfjr gqbZ pksVksa ds QyLOk:i mlds 'kjhj ij dqy 17 izfr'kr dh LFkkbZ fu;ksZX;rk vkuk ik;k x;k gS] tSlk fd LFkkbZ fu;ksZX;rk izek.k i= izn'kZ&63 ds voyksdu ls Li"V gSA eksVj nq?kZVuk esa vkgr O;fDr;ksa dks {kfriwfrZ fnyok;s tkus ds lanHkZ esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk vius U;kf;d n`"Vkar Anant Son of Sidheswar Dukre Vs. Pratap son of Zhampannappa Lamzane & Anr. Reported in (2018) 9 Supreme Court Cases

450, esa fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS tks fuEu izdkj ls gS %&

“12. In case of motor accidents leading to injuries and disablements, it is a well settled principle that a person must not only be compensated for his physical injury, but also for the non-pecuniary losses which he has suffered due to the injury. The claimant is entitled to be compensated for his i