[2026:RJ-JP:2271]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

14075/2025 Puran Meena S/o Jai Singh Meena, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Veerkhana Kua, Bansur, Police Station Bansur, District Kotputli-

Behror At Present Lodged In The Central Jail, Alwar.

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashvin Garg For Complainant(s) : Ms. Harshita Sharma for Dr. Mahesh Sharma For State : Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Order

19/01/2026

1. Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.0201/2025 registered with the Police Station Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror for offence under Section 103(1) of B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3, 25, 25(6), 5 & 27 of Arms Act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely with the add of Section 61(2)(a) of B.N.S., 2023. He further submits that the only evidence against the petitioner is the alleged information said to be given to him under Section 23(2) of Indian Evidence Act, that he arranged meeting of accused Akhil Saini, Pawan Saini @ Monu, Manish Gurjar @ Rahul and Manoj Meena with Krishan Yadav @ Krishan Pahalwan. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 05.07.2025 and trial of the case will take time to conclude, therefore, the accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that co-accused have committed murder of the deceased Sunil @ Tulli by inflicting firearm injuries and it is accused petitioner who arranged meeting of the sharp shooters.

4. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant and also perused the challan papers.

5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case so also the allegations against the petitioner and the evidence collected during investigation and so also the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 05.07.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

6. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /70