SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 4311

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ASHUTOSH KUMAR
BHANUPRATAP S/O SHRI SHANKAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
KAMLESH GOYAL S/O ISHWAR CHAND GOYAL – Respondent
CMA / 2734 / 2023



[2026:RJ-JP:5021]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2734/2023 Bhanupratap S/o Shri Shankar Singh, Aged 17 Years, R/o Bhura Tiba Kachi Basti, Harmada, Jaipur, Petitioner minor presenting through Father and natural guardian Shankar Singh S/o Durga Singh, Aged 61 Years, R/o Bhura Tiba Kachi Basti, Harmada, Jaipur.

----Appellant Versus

1. Kamlesh Goyal S/o Ishwar Chand Goyal, R/o 3045/5, Palsaniya Road, Naseerabad, District Ajmer. (Driver of Vehicle No. RJ-09-GC-2180).

2. Mohd. Imran S/o Shri Moh. Rafiq, R/o Mukeri Mohalla Naseerabad, P.S Naseerabad, District Ajmer, Raj. At Present R/O Soniyana, Tehsil Gangrar, Distt. Chittorgarh, Raj. (Owner of Vehicle No. RJ-09-GC-2180).

3. National Insurance Co. Ltd., Through Manager Address Jeevan Nidhi Bhawan Ambedkar Circle, Bhawani Singh Road, Jaipur. (Insurer of Vehicle No. RJ-09-GC-2180), Insurance Period 10-06-2018 To 09-06-2019, Accident Date 10-12-2018.

----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Pankaj Sharma, Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manorma Sharma, Adv.

(For Insurance Company)

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

Order

16/01/2026

1- vihykFkhZ Hkkuqizrki dh vksj ls tfj;s lja {kd firk 'kda j flga }kjk ;g vihy /kkjk&173 eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e&1988 ds rgr U;k;ky; eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k la[;k&01] t;iqj egkuxj] t;iqj ¼ftls vkxs ^fo}ku vf/kdj.k* ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ }kjk Dyse ;kfpdk la[;k&91@2020] Hkkuqizrki cuke deys'k oxSjk esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 20-06-2023 ¼ftls vkxs ^vk{ksfir fu.kZ;^ ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ ds fo#) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

2- vihykFkhZ Hkkuqizrki }kjk tfj;s laj{kd firk 'kadj flga ds fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds le{k] Lo;a ds eksVj okgu nq?kZVuk esa vkgr gks tkus ds QyLo:i dqy 51]00]000@& #i;s Dyse izkIr djus grs q Dyse ;kfpdk izLrqr dh x;h FkhA fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk mDr Dyse ;kfpdk esa vihykFkhZ dks dqy 4]63]262@& #i;s dh {kfriwfrZ jkf'k e; C;kt 7 izfr'kr lkykuk dh nj ls fnyokbZ x;h gSA fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds mDr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ls O;fFkr gksdj gLrxr vihy] vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus grs q izLrqr dh x;h gSA

3- nkSjkus cgl fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZ dh dkYifud vk; 30]000@& :i;s okf"kZd fu/kkZfjr dh tkdj =qfV dkfjr dh gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZ dks Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh vk; o`f) ckcr Hkh dksbZ {kfriwfrZ jkf'k ugha fnyokbZ xbZ gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk 'kkjhfjd o ekufld ihMk+ dh en esa rFkk Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh lq[k&lqfo/kk dh deh ds en esa Hkh leqfpr jkf'k ugha fnyokbZ gS rFkk vU; enksa esa Hkh vR;f/kd de jkf'k fnyokbZ x;h gS] ftuesa c<+ksrjh dh tkosA vr% vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy Lohdkj dh tkdj {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;hA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls vius rdksZa ds leFkZu fuEu U;kf;d n`"VkUr izLrqr fd;s x;s%&

01. Civil Appeal No. 10278/2025 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.

14444/2025, Hitesh Nagjibhai Patel Vs. Bababhai Nagjibhai Rabari & Anr.

02. Civil Appeal No. 4493/2025 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.

2695/2024, Kumari Laxmisree Vs. The Managing Director, KSRCTC Depot, Bengaluru.

4- blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ chek daiuh dh vksj ls vihykFkhZ ds mijksDr rdksZa dk fojks/k djrs gq, fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk ikfjr fd;s x;s fu.kZ; dh iqf"V fd;s tkus rFkk vihykFkhZ dh vkjs ls lfa LFkr dh x;h vihy dks fujLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

5- nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh x;hA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

6- gLrxr ekeys dh nq?kZVuk esa vihykFkhZ dks dkfjr gqbZ pksVksa ds QyLOk:i mlds 'kjhj ij dqy 80 izfr'kr dh LFkkbZ fu;ksZX;rk vkuk ik;k x;k gSA eksVj nq?kZVuk esa vkgr O;fDr;ksa dks {kfriwfrZ fnyok;s tkus ds lanHkZ esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk vius U;kf;d n`"Vkar Anant Son of Sidheswar Dukre Vs. Pratap son of Zhampannappa Lamzane & Anr. Reported in (2018) 9 Supreme Court Cases

450, esa fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS tks fuEu izdkj ls gS %&

“12. In case of motor accidents leading to injuries and disablements, it is a well settled principle

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top