SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 4329

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
GANESH RAM MEENA
KAYAM S/O CHHOTU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 2118 / 2025



[2026:RJ-JP:1887]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

2118/2025 Kayam S/o Chhotu, R/o Village Chinawada, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg (Rajasthan.)

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Order

16/01/2026

1. Petitioner has filed this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.0020/2024 registered with the Police Station, Gopalgarh, District Deeg for offence under Sections 143, 323, 341, 379 & 435 of I.P.C.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are cross cases in between the parties. He further submits that the petitioner himself has sustained fracture on the vital bone. He further submits that the injury sustained by the injured complainant party are found to be simple in nature. He also submits that the Court vide order dated 08.05.2025, directed the submits that in view of the direction of the Court, the petitioner been interrogated and now he is not required for any kind of interrogation or recovery.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the anticipatory bail application, however, he verifies the fact that the petitioner in view of the direction of the Court has appeared before the Investigating Officer and has been interrogated.

4. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and the material made available on record.

5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that the injuries sustained by the injured complainant party are found to be simple in nature and the petitioner has joined the investigation under the direction of the Court, this Court deems just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. The Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg in F.I.R. No. 0020/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to his satisfaction on the following conditions:-

(I). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer, and (iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /281

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top