[2026:RJ-JP:633]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

15627/2025 Wakeel Ahmad S/o Rojdar, R/o Village Ghudawali, Tehsil Hathin, Police Station Utawada, District Palwal, Haryana At Present Ward No. 15, Shiv Basti, Firozepur Jhirka. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Kishangarhbas, District Khairthal-Tijara).

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohd Shakir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Addl.G.A. cum P.P.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Order

08/01/2026

1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.07/2025 registered at Police Station Cyber Police Thana, District Bhiwadi for offences under Sections 317(2), 317(4), 318(2), 318(4), 112(2) & 61(2) of B.N.S., 2023 and section 66D of Information Technology Act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he is in custody since 20.09.2025. Counsel further submits that Police after completion of investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the petitioner is no more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery. Counsel further submits that trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, he may be released on bail.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State opposed the bail application.

4. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor.

5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner so also the fact that Police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and so also the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 20.09.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

6. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

7. It has been brought to the notice of this Court that the accused-persons of particular areas, who are involved in the online fraud, after their release from a criminal case, will celebrate their release in public. Hence, taking into consideration the aforesaid aspect, a condition is imposed that the petitioner shall not celebrate his release in public and if he is found to be involved in celebrating his release in public, the State shall be at liberty to move the application for cancellation of his bail.

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /149