SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 4589

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
SANJEET PUROHIT
PUSHPA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
BIMLA DEVI – Respondent


[2026:RJ-JD:354]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13830/2018 Pushpa Devi W/o Shri Jai Ram, Aged About 45 Years, B/c Sindhi Ward No. 1, 3 Str, Nai Mandi, Gharsana, District- Sriganganagar (Raj.).

----Petitioner Versus

1. Bimla Devi W/o Shri Rameshwar Lal, B/c Jat, Ward No. 1, 3 Str, Nai Mandi Gharsana, District- Sriganganagar (Raj.).

2. Jai Ram S/o Shri Sewa Ram, B/c Sindhi, Resident Of -

Ward No. 1, 3 Str, Nai Mandi, Gharsana, District-

Sriganganagar (Raj.).

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemant Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. D.S. Rajvi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT

Order

07/0 1/2026

1. The present writ petition has been preferred challenging the order dated 03.08.2018, by which the application under Order 1 Rule 10(2) read with Section 151 CPC preferred by the petitioner-

applicant was dismissed.

2. Facts germane to the present writ petition are that states that respondent no. 2 - defendant had taken the suit-premises on rent only for a limited period, but the defendant has refused to vacate the same and has also not paid rent. Thus, the respondent no. 1 - plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of possession and arrears of rent since 22

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top