SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 4597

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ASHUTOSH KUMAR
SUBHASH CHAND S/O BALL RAM – Appellant
Versus
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. – Respondent
CMA / 5105 / 2019



[2026:RJ-JP:1002]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 5105/2019 Subhash Chand S/o Balla Ram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Dhani Doli Tala Tan Bilva, Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu, Raj.

----Appellant Versus

1. The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Through Registered office oriental House, A-25/27, Asaf Ali Road, New Dehli 110002, Near Branch office Station Road, Jhunjhunu, Raj.

2. Suresh Kumar S/o Binjaram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Dhani Chabutra Wali Tan Ganwali, Biharipur, P.S. Patan District Sikar, Raj. (Driver)

3. Dharampal S/o Sardarram, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Dhani Badarkawali, Tan Ramkumarpura, P.S. and Tehsil Kehtri, District Jhunjhunu, Raj. (Registered Owner Vehicle No. RJ 21-UA-2504)

----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Ms. Shreya Khandal, Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rizwan Ahmed, Adv. with Mr. Mohsin, Adv. (For Insurance Company)

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

Order

06/01/2026

1- vihykFkhZ lqHkk"k pUn }kjk ;g vihy /kkjk 173 eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e&1988 ds rgr U;k;ky; eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k ¼vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k½] [ksrMh] ftyk >q>a quw] jktLFkku ¼ftls vkxs ^fo}ku vf/kdj.k* ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ }kjk Dyse ;kfpdk la[;k&19@2014] lqHkk"k PkUn cuke nh vksfj;UVy bU';ksjsUl daiuh fyfeVsM o vU; esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 05-07-2019 ds fo#) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

2- vihykFkhZ lqHkk"k pUn }kjk fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds le{k] Lo;a ds eksVj okgu nq?kZVuk esa vkgr gks tkus ds QyLo:i dqy 50]10]000@& #i;s Dyse izkIr djus gsrq Dyse ;kfpdk izLrqr dh x;h FkhA fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk mDr Dyse ;kfpdk esa vihykFkhZ dks dqy 23]58]250@& #i;s dh {kfriwfrZ jkf’k e; C;kt 6 izfr’kr lkykuk dh nj ls fnyokbZ x;h gSA fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds mDr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ls O;fFkr gksdj gLrxr vihy] vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus grs q izLrqr dh x;h gSA

3- nkSjkus cgl fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk rdZ jgk fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk oDr ?kVuk vihykFkhZ dh ekfld vk; 4]500@& :Ik;s fu/kkZfjr dh tkdj =qfV dkfjr dh gS] tcfd vihykFkhZ oDr ?kVuk d`f"kZ] i'kqikyu o nw/k M;sjh dk dk;Z djds 10]000@& :i;s ekfld vk; vftZr djrk FkkA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZ dks Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh vk; o`f) ckcr dksbZ {kfriwfrZ jkf'k ugha fnyokbZ xbZ gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk 'kkjhfjd o ekufld ihMk+ dh en esa rFkk Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh lq[k&lqfo/kk dh deh ds en esa Hkh leqfpr jkf'k ugha fnyokbZ gS rFkk vU; enksa esa Hkh vR;f/kd de jkf'k fnyokbZ x;h gS] ftuesa c<+ksrjh dh tkosA vr% vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy Lohdkj dh tkdj {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;hA

4- blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ chek dEiuh dh vksj ls vihykFkhZ ds mijksDr rdksZa dk fojks/k djrs gq, fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk ikfjr fd;s x;s fu.kZ; dh iqf"V fd;s tkus rFkk vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls lfa LFkr dh x;h vihy dks fujLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

5- nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh x;hA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

6- gLrxr ekeys dh nq?kZVuk esa vihykFkhZ dks dkfjr gqbZ pksVksa ds QyLOk:i mlds 'kjhj ij dqy 60 izfr'kr dh LFkkbZ fu;ksZX;rk vkuk ik;k x;k gSA eksVj nq?kZVuk esa vkgr O;fDr;ksa dks {kfriwfrZ fnyok;s tkus ds lanHkZ esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk vius U;kf;d n`"Vkar Anant Son of Sidheswar Dukre Vs. Pratap son of Zhampannappa Lamzane & Anr. Reported in (2018) 9 Supreme Court Cases

450, esa fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS tks fuEu izdkj ls gS %&

“12. In case of motor accidents leading to injuries and disablements, it is a well settled principle that a person must not only be compensated for his physical injury, but also for the non-pecuniary losses which he has suffered due to the injury. The claimant is entitled to be compensated for his inability to lead a full life, and enjoy those things and amenities which he would have enjoyed, but for the injuries."

"13. The purpose of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act is to fully and adequately restore the aggrieved to the position prior to the accident. This Court in Yadava Kumar v. National Insurance Co. Ltd

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top