[2026:RJ-JP:164]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16191/2025 Jyani Devi W/o Shri Anil Kumar, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Amarpura Kalan, Police Station Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Jhunjhunu).

----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shailender Singh Balwada For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Public Prosecutor Mr. Vinay Pal Yadav for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Order

06/01/2026

1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.193/2025 registered at Police Station Suraj Garh, District Jhunjhunu for the offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 127(2), 140(2) & 103(1) of BNS, 2023.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner is a woman aged about 45 years and she is in custody since 16.06.2025. It is also submitted by counsel for the accused- petitioner that the FIR has been lodged by an eye-witness of the accused-petitioner.

3. Learned counsel further submits that total 14 persons have been arrayed as an accused and as per the post-mortem report of the deceased, he has sustained 21 injuries. He also submits that it is very unnatural that when the male persons are involved in an incident, the female members of that family will also actively participate for causing injury. He also submits that the Police after completion of investigation has already submitted the charge- sheet and the accused-petitioner is no more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant vehemently opposed the bail application. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that the cause of death of the deceased is of cumulative effect of all the injuries sustained by him. He also submits that the deceased was abducted and taken to the house of the of the accused-petitioner where she alongwith other family members have given beating to the deceased.

5. On perusal of the averments made in the FIR, it is revealed that against as many as 14 persons there are allegations of giving beating to the deceased but no specific overt act has been assigned to the present accused-petitioner. The FIR has been lodged by an eye-witness but in the same he has not attributed any particular injury to the present accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner is a woman and she is in custody since

16.06.2025.

6. Taking into consideration overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that the accused-petitioner is a woman and she is in custody since 16.06.2025 and in the FIR expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for her appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /164