SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 4619

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
NANDLAL S/O KALYAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMP / 3355 / 2025



[2026:RJ-JP:228]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3355/2025

1. Nandlal S/o Kalyan, R/o Mund Ki Dhani, Nevta, Police Sta-

tion Sez, Jaipur City (West).

2. Chhitar S/o Kalyan, R/o Mund Ki Dhani, Nevta, Police Sta-

tion Sez, Jaipur City (West).

3. Hanuman S/o Nandlal, R/o Mund Ki Dhani, Nevta, Police Station Sez, Jaipur City (West).

4. Ramjanki W/o Hanuman, R/o Mund Ki Dhani, Nevta, Po-

lice Station Sez, Jaipur City (West).

5. Jhutharam S/o Kanaram, R/o Mund Ki Dhani, Nevta, Po-

lice Station Sez, Jaipur City (West).

6. Ghasiram S/o Kanaram, R/o Mund Ki Dhani, Nevta, Police Station Sez, Jaipur City (West).

7. Bhomaram S/o Kanaram, R/o Mund Ki Dhani, Nevta, Po-

lice Station Sez, Jaipur City (West).

8. Ramu S/o Kanaram, R/o Mund Ki Dhani, Nevta, Police Station Sez, Jaipur City (West).

9. Lokesh S/o Bhomaram, R/o Mund Ki Dhani, Nevta, Police Station Sez, Jaipur City (West).

10. Shyojiram S/o Ghasiram, R/o Mund Ki Dhani, Nevta, Po-

lice Station Sez, Jaipur City (West).

11. Ramesh S/o Birdhi Chand, R/o Mund Ki Dhani, Nevta, Po-

lice Station Sez, Jaipur City (West).

12. Gopal S/o Ganesh, R/o Mund Ki Dhani, Nevta, Police Sta-

tion Sez, Jaipur City (West).

13. Laduram S/o Ganesh, R/o Mund Ki Dhani, Nevta, Police Station Sez, Jaipur City (West).

14. Vishal S/o Laduram, R/o Mund Ki Dhani, Nevta, Police Station Sez, Jaipur City (West).

15. Birdhi Chand S/o Ganesh, R/o Mund Ki Dhani, Nevta, Po-

lice Station Sez, Jaipur City (West).

16. Vikas S/o Manglaram, R/o Mund Ki Dhani, Nevta, Police Station Sez, Jaipur City (West).

17. Smt. Raju Devi W/o Manglaram, R/o Mund Ki Dhani, Nevta, Police Station Sez, Jaipur City (West).

18. Norati Devi W/o Laduram, R/o Mund Ki Dhani, Nevta, Po-

lice Station Sez, Jaipur City (West).

19. Beena Devi W/o Ramu Moond, R/o Mund Ki Dhani, Nevta, Police Station Sez, Jaipur City (West).

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor, Jaipur (Rajasthan)

2. Mohan Lal S/o Bhanwarlal, R/o Mund Ki Dhani, Nevta, Po-

lice Station Sez, Jaipur City (West).

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Virender Godara For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP For Complainant(s) : Mr. Swadeep Singh Hora HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN

Order

06/01/2026

1. Instant criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of the BNSS has been filed on behalf of the accused petitioners for quashing the impugned FIR No.69/2025 registered at Police Station SEZ, District Jaipur (West) for offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2) & 189(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023 and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) & 3(2)(va) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (Amendment 2015)

along with all subsequent proceedings arising out of it.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that parties have settled their dispute amicably and they have entered into compromise.

3. Learned counsel for the complainant while accepting the factum of compromise submits that the complainant has no objection if the impugned FIR and all subsequent proceedings are quashed.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that since the FIR has been registered under the provisions of SC/ST Act, the same cannot be quashed on the basis of compromise. He, however, accepts the factum of compromise having been entered into without coercion and duress.

5. In order to support his contention that FIR/proceedings under the provisions of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘SC/ST Act’) can be quashed, learned counsel for the petitioner invites attention of this Court towards the order dated 25.10.2021 passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Ramawatar versus State of Madhya Pradesh reported in AIR 2021 SC

5228

6. In the above referred case of Ramawatar (supra), Hon’ble Supreme Court has observed the following:

“12. In view of the settled proposition of law, we affirm the decision of this Court in Ramgopal (Supra) and reiterate that the powers of this Court

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top