SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 16764

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
ASLAM KHAN S/O SUBRATI KHAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW / 19277 / 2025



[2025:RJ-JP:50018]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19277/2025

1. Aslam Khan S/o Subrati Khan, Aged About 23 Years, Security Guard, Rsrtc, Central Bus Stand ,sindhi Camp , Jaipur

2. Brijesh Meena, Son Of Kailash Chand Meena, Aged About

25 Years, Security Guard, Rsrtc, Central Bus Stand ,sindhi Camp, Jaipur

3. Jyoti Sharma W/o Hanuman Gautam, Aged About 39 Years, Security Guard, Rsrtc, Central Bus Stand ,sindhi Camp , Jaipur

4. Sumer Singh Meena, S/o Sripat Meena, Aged About 35 Years, Security Guard, Rsrtc, Central Bus Stand , Sindhi Camp , Jaipur

5. Ramkishen Harijan S/o Bhinwa Ram Harijan, Aged About

40 Years, Security Guard, Rsrtc, Central Bus Stand ,sindhi Camp , Jaipur

6. Ramdayal Meena S/o Lalaram Meena, Aged About 31 Years, Security Guard, Rsrtc, Central Bus Stand, Sindhi Camp, Jaipur

7. Rameshwar Lal Gujar S/o Matadeen, Aged About 45 Years, Security Guard, Rsrtc, Central Bus Stand, Sindhi Camp, Jaipur

8. Mahesh Kumar Bairwa S/o Ghasiram Bairwa, Aged About

28 Years, Security Guard, Rsrtc, Central Bus Stand ,sindhi Camp , Jaipur ----Petitioners Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat Building, Jaipur

2. The Labour Commissioner, Labour Department, Hasanpura, Near Nbcc, Jaipur

3. The Chairman, Rajasthan State Roadways Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur

4. The Managing Director, Rajasthan State Roadways Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur

5. The Executive Director (Administration), Rajasthan State Roadways Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur

6. The Chief Manager, Rsrtc, Central Bus Stand, Sindhi Camp, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Neerja Khanna For Respondent(s) :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN

Order

08/12/2025

1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer:

“It is, therefore, humbly prayed that this Hon'ble court be pleased to allow this writ petition and may further be pleased:

(1). To direct the respondents corporation to continue the services of the petitioners and regularized them as directed by the Hon' ble Court in different orders of Mitendra Singh Rathore (SLP) No. 32671/2013, Mooli Devi Chowdhary vs. State of Rajasthan, Surendra Kumar Gurjar vs. State of Rajasthan case. etc. 2). To quash and set aside orders dated 26.8.2025 and 29.9.2025 issued by the respondent. (3). To order respondents to advertise the vacancies for regular selection process instead of through placement agencies and continue the guards of previous agencies directly with respondents till the regular selection process is undertaken;

(4) To issue any other appropriate writ, order or direction to respondents to cancel the tender as again they have advertised for change of placement agencies rather than recruiting guards on vacant posts directly;

(5). To pay minimum pay scale to contractual guards as they are paying to unfit drivers for working as security guards.

(6). To issue any other appropriate writ, order or direction as may be deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

(7). To issue writ, direction or order respondents Withdraw and revoke the Impugned Demotion Order dated 26.08.2025 demoting Our Client from the ‘Highly Skilled’

to the ‘Skilled’ category.

(8). To declare tender of clause null and void and issue direction to tendering authority to amend or delete the arbitrary provision.

(9). To direct respondents to pay minimum pay scale as unfit drivers are being paid scaled for same job and till the regular selection process may not reduce salary from Rs.359 to 309 per day (10). To directs the respondents not to discontinue the existing guards while following this process;

(11). To issue any other appropriate writ, order or direction as may be deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

2. Learned counsel for petitioners while placing reliance upon order dated 29.05.2017 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2672/2017 Ramu Ram Godara Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. and order in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top